Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Licence
Correction: A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO2 removal pathways
Solene
Chiquier
ab,
Piera
Patrizio
ab,
Mai
Bui
ab,
Nixon
Sunny
ab and
Niall
Mac Dowell
*ab
aCentre for Environmental Policy, Imperial College London, UK. E-mail: niall@imperial.ac.uk; Tel: +44 (0)20 7594 9298
bCentre for Process Systems Engineering, Imperial College London, UK
First published on 20th December 2022
Abstract
Correction for ‘A comparative analysis of the efficiency, timing, and permanence of CO2 removal pathways’ by Solene Chiquier et al., Energy Environ. Sci., 2022, 15, 4389–4403, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2EE01021F.
The authors would like to add a citation to the main paper. Note that this correction does not affect the analysis or the results. The reference was already cited in the supplementary information as the data source used for the seawater mineralisation direct air capture (DAC) process.
The text on page 7 and 8 should be updated to include the citation and read as follows:
Whilst not capturing CO 2 from directly from the air, emerging approaches such as seawater mineralisation processes significantly smaller volumes—water contains 150 times more CO 2 than air per unit volume—and produces a solid carbonate, thus, avoiding the need for CO 2 compression & storage. 1
The Royal Society of Chemistry apologises for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.
References
- E. C. La Plante, D. A. Simonetti, J. Wang, A. Al-Turki, X. Chen, D. Jassby and G. N. Sant, ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng., 2021, 9, 1073–1089 CrossRef.
| This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |