W.
Arts
*,
K.
Van Aelst
,
E.
Cooreman
,
J.
Van Aelst
,
S.
Van den Bosch
and
B. F.
Sels
*
Centre for Sustainable Catalysis and Engineering, Department of Microbial and Molecular Systems, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200F, 3001 Leuven, Belgium. E-mail: wouter.arts@kuleuven.be; bert.sels@kuleuven.be
First published on 2nd May 2023
Lignin-first reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) is an emerging lignocellulose biorefinery technology that produces a unique lignin-derived bio-oil rich in functionalized phenolics in addition to (hemi)cellulose products. We present here a novel industrial-scale process that achieves a drastic reduction of the costs and the CO2 footprint of RCF biorefining through a reaction liquor and solvent recycle system by which the pristine solvent, here methanol, is enriched with reaction (by-)products resulting in novel solvent mixtures other than the pure solvent(s) (e.g., methanol or methanol/water) commonly used in RCF. The impact of the liquor recycling %, a key process variable that determines the load on the crude oil distillation column for solvent recuperation, was systematically examined through a coupled techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) of the RCF biorefinery processing 150 kton birch wood per year. These analyses showed that the lignin oil minimum selling price (MSP-RLO) and global warming potential (GWP-RLO) can be as low as 1000 € per ton and 1.5 kgCO2 kgProduct−1 at a high liquor recycling (>70%) as the fuel consumption and capital costs associated with energy provisioning are significantly reduced in this way. These modelling results were corroborated by lab-scale experiments that mimic the simulated unique solvent compositions. Solvent mixtures comprising methanol (40–65 vol%), methyl acetate (20–25 vol%), acetic acid (0–2 vol%), water (10–20 vol%), and crude lignin oil (10–20 vol%) enhance lignin extraction (90–95%), achieve high monomer yields (syringyl-monomer yield >20%) and stimulate hemicellulose co-extraction (>45%). In addition, novel lignin oil phenolics are produced by partial acetylation of propanol sidechains. The RCF biorefinery economics were improved by lowering the reaction time and temperature at high liquor recycling to limit the reactor capital costs. By halving the reaction time from 2 to 1 h, the MSP-RLO drops to ∼800 € per ton despite a somewhat lower lignin oil productivity. Finally, the general applicability of this process design was shown by applying the integrated computational-experimental approach developed in this work on a softwood, and a hardwood with high moisture content.
Broader contextIn transitioning towards a sustainable chemical industry, lignocellulose biomass bears an enormous potential as a renewable carbon feedstock to manufacture chemicals and materials. Beside the lignocellulose carbohydrates, also the lignin, a hetero-aromatic biopolymer making up 15–30% of the plant biomass, must be effectively valorised into useful products, which remains challenging. Reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF) is a promising biorefinery step that fractionates lignocellulose into useful precursors for downstream applications namely, a carbohydrate pulp and bio-oil rich in lignin-derived phenolics. However, for RCF to be implemented and scaled to an industrial production process, the economic and environmental costs for solvent purification by distillation and the capital expenses associated with the large-volume reactors must be strongly diminished. This work presents a novel concept for an RCF biorefinery process where the use of an innovative recycling system leads to unique solvent compositions comprising the pristine solvent methanol, enriched with reaction (by-)products in RCF. In this way, the selling price and CO2 footprint of the lignin oil product can be drastically reduced, making competition with fossil analogues possible. |
One such a promising lignin-first biorefinery concept is reductive catalytic fractionation (RCF). In RCF, lignocellulose is fractionated into a carbohydrate pulp and lignin oil, rich in phenolic monomers and oligomers, at high temperature (200–250 °C) and pressure (50–100 bar) in an organic solvent, usually a short-chain alcohol (e.g. methanol), to which a redox catalyst (e.g., Ru/C) and a hydrogen donor (e.g., H2) are added.17,27,28 The irreversible recondensation of reactive lignin fragments, released from the lignocellulose matrix after simultaneous extraction and depolymerization of the native lignin, is prevented by a reductive stabilization step which is facilitated by the combined action of the redox-catalyst and hydrogen source.29–31 RCF has known multiple conceptual alterations since its (re-)emergence in the past decade. The effect of the solvent composition,19,32–37 catalyst formulation,18,22,29,34,38–40 hydrogen donor,19,20,35–37,41,42 and lignocellulose feedstock17,18,21,31,43–45 on the delignification and lignin oil properties (e.g., chemical functionality, monomer yield, molecular weight distribution etc.) in RCF have been extensively reported. Most of these studies were completed in a batch reactor mode, from small mL to larger L scale, which was later challenged by a flow-through system where the biomass and catalyst are physically separated in two independent fixed beds.46–49 This reactor configuration allowed to study the kinetics of the main reaction steps viz., solvolysis, reductive stabilization and recondensation independently, leading to a better understanding of the inherent relations between mass transfer and chemical reaction in RCF.30,50
The main products of the RCF biorefinery, the carbohydrate pulp and lignin oil are excellent precursors for multiple chemical products like fuels (e.g., ethanol,17 naphtha,51 jet fuel52,53), platform chemicals (e.g., phenol,54,55 propylene,55 ethylene glycol56,57), polymers (e.g., polycarbonate,58 polyurethanes,52 epoxy resins59,60), coatings,61 adhesives (e.g., epoxy resin62), antioxidants,63,64 surfactants,25etc. This signifies the large valorisation potential of lignocellulose biorefining with RCF.
For RCF to be feasible at industrial scale, it must fit within a larger processing framework in which chemical reaction and downstream separation processes are efficiently combined to convert lignocellulose into price-competitive and sustainable products.65–67 Techno-economic analysis (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) are well-known methodologies that enable to prematurely assess the economic and environmental performance of a novel chemical process by calculating typical performance indicators such as the minimum selling price (MSP) and the global warming potential (GWP) based on the technical framework provided by a detailed process simulation.68 Such an assessment was first completed for RCF by Liao et al.55 They presented an economically-competitive biorefinery producing a pulp, amenable to ethanol production and a lignin oil with RCF of birch lignocellulose. The lignin oil monomers were further processed into phenol and propylene with a series of catalytic steps, and the lignin oil oligomers were used in printing ink as replacement for para-nonylphenol, a controversial petrochemical.55 LCA estimated that a lower CO2 footprint (i.e., −60%) could be achieved for these biorefinery products compared to their fossil-based counterparts.55 This demonstrative study was followed by a more detailed analysis of Bartling et al.50 They identified the major cost and environmental sustainability drivers of a similar RCF biorefinery process that produces a crude lignin oil and ethanol, obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of the pulp polysaccharides. The RCF area of their base case process consists of a reactor area, followed by a centrifugation step, to remove the solid pulp, and a two-stage distillation where the solvent, methanol, and water, released from the lignocellulose during RCF, are separated from the crude lignin oil in a first step, and the composition of the solvent recycle stream is tuned in the second step. The solvent methanol, which contains some water, is redirected to the reactor area and the remaining water is sent to a wastewater treatment unit. The major cost drivers identified with this process configuration were (i) the capital costs for the high-pressure reactors and (ii) the operational costs for the natural gas necessary to provide the process heat for the solvent distillation steps. It was suggested that priority should be given to RCF with a minimal solvent loading (i.e., solvent-to-biomass ratio) to reduce capital expenses associated with large volume reactors and limit the energy requirements and corresponding fossil CO2 emissions for solvent recuperation.50 As a way to reduce the overall solvent usage, Jang et al. experimentally showed that lignin oil can be concentrated in the solvent – up to 12 wt% – without losing performance in terms of lignin removal and monomer yield in flow-through RCF.48
We present an innovative process configuration for an RCF biorefinery that produces a lignin oil, a carbohydrate pulp, and an aqueous stream rich in sugar-derivatives from birch lignocellulose at a drastically reduced cost and CO2 footprint compared to previous reports. Supported by a more complete, experimentally verified mass balance for RCF with a pure solvent methanol and birch, we developed a new liquor and solvent recycle system with a reduced distillation load in which (i) methanol, (ii) methyl acetate and acetic acid, formed by hemicellulose deacetylation, and (iii) water, released from the lignocellulose matrix, are recycled back to the reactor area along with (iv) the crude lignin oil, containing lignin phenolics and methylated sugars. TEA and LCA of this RCF process configuration show that the capital expenses, the process heating costs, and CO2 emissions can be significantly reduced at the steady-state composition of the solvent mixture that is obtained when the load on the crude oil distillation column is reduced by recycling part of the reaction liquor back to the reactor. Guided by the simulation results, we investigated and verified the technical feasibility and flexibility of this process configuration by experimentation with these solvent mixtures containing methanol, methyl acetate, water, acetic acid, and crude lignin oil in lab-scale RCF. Promisingly, a higher delignification, phenolic monomer yield and a purer pulp can be obtained with this multi-solvent system in which reaction (by-)products are partially enriched compared to pure methanol RCF. Presence of acetates in the solvent mixture also induced the formation of phenolics with acetylated C3 sidechains, in this way, expanding the refinery's product portfolio. We also demonstrate that this process configuration can be further optimized for reaction time and temperature and is generally applicable to other feedstock types (e.g., softwood). This study shows how an integrated approach combining process modelling and experimental research was exploited to innovate and optimize the RCF process towards an economically feasible and sustainable lignin-first biorefinery.
Fig. 1 Mass consumption and formation in RCF on a 100 kg birch wood basis. The lignocellulose was assumed to have a moisture content of 15 wt% on a wet basis to account for incomplete drying of wood chips used in industrial scale processes compared to wood sawdust (±5 wt%) used in lab-scale experiments. In line with our experimental analysis of the reaction liquor, it was assumed that all the water is released from the wood in RCF. The extractives, a diverse group of chemical compounds, though mainly apolar in nature, are only minorly present in the substrate with 2.5 wt%. They were assumed to behave similarly as the lignin oil components throughout the biorefinery process, hence end up in the crude lignin oil and eventually, in the refined lignin oil. Ash (0.4 wt%) was assumed to remain in the carbohydrate pulp. The consumption of methanol was estimated by the formation of methyl acetate and methylated sugars and its reformation to CO, CO2 and other gaseous molecules analysed by off-gas analysis (Table S1, ESI†). Although the methylated C6 sugar derivatives were detected with GC-FID (Fig. S3, ESI†), they are not shown in this figure given their limited formation in RCF (<0.1 kg based on 100 kg of wood) as was determined by wood and pulp compositional analyses. |
The RCF reactor was modelled as a continuous system of 4 parallel reactors which convert wood into pulp, crude lignin oil, methyl acetate and water, according to an extrapolated reactor mass balance shown in Fig. 1 for 100 kg of wood. The methyl acetate hydrolysis/esterification equilibrium reaction was also modelled based on the molar amounts of methyl acetate, water and methanol to account for methyl acetate hydrolysis to acetic acid. We assumed chemical equilibrium of this reaction with an equilibrium constant of 0.06 for the forward hydrolysis and backwards esterification reaction at elevated temperatures (>200 °C).70 It was also assumed that the catalyst is physically separated from the biomass to avoid a difficult solid–solid separation which can be achieved in practice by a flow-through system30,47–49 or batch system with catalyst basket.29,65 Despite that a fully continuous reactor does not yet exist for RCF, it allows to study the integration of the reactor mass in- and outflows with the downstream processing, which is the main purpose of this work. Even with a system of parallel batch or flow-through reactors acting as a continuous system, a similar integration of the reactor mass flows within the entire process, as proposed here, can be achieved. Solvent is added to the reactor at a ratio of 10 L (at RT) per kg of dry biomass which is comparable to the lab-scale solvent-to-biomass ratio (see ‘RCF mass balance’). The solvent stream must be supplemented with fresh methanol to account for solvent losses in the reaction and downstream processing and to ensure a constant volumetric flow rate (at RT). Similarly, hydrogen is fed to the reactor at a rate of 0.05 kg hydrogen per kg of dry biomass (± conform the loading of hydrogen in the lab reactor at 30 bar at RT), and make-up hydrogen is added to a gas recycle stream to account for hydrogen consumption in RCF. The reactor inlet streams viz., the fresh wood, solvents and hydrogen are conditioned to 220 °C and 90 bar before reactor entry. After RCF, which lasts 2 h, the gases and vapours are removed from the reactor via an in-line flash at high temperature and pressure and are subsequently cooled and fed to a flash tank to separate the gases from the vapours viz., methanol, methyl acetate and some water, which are recovered as a liquid. Excess hydrogen is purified from the gaseous stream containing some short-chain alkanes, CO and CO2 by pressure swing adsorption (PSA), which was modelled as a component split, and is recycled to the reactor section. The reaction slurry is cooled down to suppress chemical reaction, depressurized, and filtered by centrifugation. The resulting liquid stream contains methanol, methyl acetate, water, crude lignin oil and some acetic acid and is fed to the crude oil distillation column. This column was designed to recover 99.9% of the inlet methanol (the light key component) in the overheads stream, with minimal entrainment of water (the heavy key component). Methyl acetate, having a lower boiling-point than methanol at the column operational pressure (2 bar), is always recuperated in the overhead stream as well. The bottoms stream of the column consists of water, the crude lignin oil, some acetic acid, and contains only little methanol. Methanol and methyl acetate of the overheads are used in a pulp washing step before being mixed with the flash tank condensate (mix 1), whilst the bottoms stream is fed to the crude oil purification section. Prior to the crude oil distillation, the liquid stream can be split at a predefined ratio (split 1) into two streams. Only one stream is fed to the column whilst the other, i.e., the liquor recycle, is pressurized and mixed (mix 2) with the condensate recycle stream of the flash tank and the distillation overheads stream. The resulting liquid stream contains methanol, methyl acetate, acetic acid, water, crude lignin oil and is redirected to the reactor section where fresh methanol is added to maintain the set volumetric flow rate of 10 L solvent (at RT) per kg dry wood. The liquid stream obtained in mix 1 can be purged (dotted line – split 2) prior to mixing in mix 2, to control the solvent composition, and in particular, the enrichment of methyl acetate in the solvent recycle stream.
The crude lignin oil is further purified by liquid–liquid extraction with ethyl acetate and water resulting in an organic phase, enriched with the lignin oil phenolics, and an aqueous phase, containing the methylated sugar derivatives. The amount of water and ethyl acetate used in the liquid–liquid extraction was set to 1.1 kg of each, per kg of crude lignin oil to ensure a good separation. Most of the water necessary for the extraction is already present in the bottoms stream of the distillation and only a small amount of fresh ethyl acetate needs to be added as most is recycled from the organic phase by a vacuum flash operation (at 0.5 bar), producing the refined lignin oil and the ethyl acetate recycle stream. Ethyl acetate is also recuperated from the aqueous stream containing the methylated sugars by a similar vacuum flash operation at low temperature (50 °C) to avoid sugar degradation. Water is not recuperated and leaves the biorefinery with the methylated sugars along with acetic acid that has concentrated up to 10 wt% in this stream. Recovery of acetic acid from this stream can be considered but was not investigated here.
The CHP providing power and heating to the biorefinery is supplied with off-gases and purge streams (if any) from the refinery. A schematic overview of the CHP is depicted in Fig. S5 (ESI†). The off gases are combusted at high temperature and pressure in the gas turbine generating power upon expansion of the combustion gases to low pressure. The heat of the flue gas is recuperated by the production of steam in a steam boiler. Additional fuel can be supplied, in case of large heating requirements. We opted for hydrogen as the ultimate energy vector as it is already provided on site for chemical reaction and it bears a significant potential as a renewable energy vector to fuel chemical production processes in the future.71
When all liquid is distilled, i.e., at zero liquor recycling, the methanol solvent stream is primarily enriched with methyl acetate (26 vol%) along with some water (1 vol%) originating from the flash tank liquid (Fig. 3). The concentration of the crude lignin oil and water increase at higher liquor recycling, though only minorly due to the relatively high solvent-to-biomass ratio of 10 L kg−1 and a low wood conversion of 35% (Fig. 1). For example, the solvent contains 7 vol% water and 6 vol% crude lignin oil at a liquor recycling of 70%. Only at the highest recycling rates (i.e., 90%), the inlet solvent stream becomes highly concentrated with water (18 vol%) and crude lignin oil (21 vol%), making up 39% of the solvent volume. Acetic acid is only minorly concentrated in the inlet solvent stream (<3 vol%), as its formation in the reactor is limited (especially at low liquor recycling) and because it is removed via the crude oil distillation bottoms stream given its higher boiling point than water, thereby escaping the solvent recycle stream. The composition of the liquid entering the crude oil distillation column shows a similar trend as the inlet solvent stream (Fig. S6, ESI†). More crude lignin oil and water become concentrated in this stream which also simplifies the solvent recuperation. The liquor recycling rate also affects the volumetric flow rate of the solvent at the fixed reactor conditions of 220 °C and 90 bar. The flow rate decreases with an increasing liquor recycling as less volatile water and crude lignin oil become more concentrated in the solvent, resulting in a smaller volumetric expansion at reaction temperature (−20% and −25% at 70% and 90% liquor recycling, respectively, compared to 0%). This implies that the reactor can be smaller, especially at high liquor recycling, which is an added advantage on top of reduced energy demand at reduced distillation loads. At 95% liquor recycling and above, the operation of the liquor recycle system was found to be infeasible as the design criterion i.e., the solvent-to-biomass ratio of 10 L kg−1 at RT for the inlet solvent stream is violated. At these high liquor recycling rates, the additional liquid mass formed in RCF, from which most is recycled, causes the solvent-to-biomass ratio at RT to surpass 10 L kg−1, making the make-up methanol redundant. The solvent composition then converges to a mixture of water, acetic acid, and crude lignin oil. Contra-intuitively, the total reactor volume required to accommodate RCF at reaction conditions is lower as the denser solvent mixtures are less volatile at high liquor recycling. It must also be noted here that in an industrial scale process, reactor volumes are fixed and cannot ‘change’. However, steady state conditions can be reached with smaller, but fixed reactor volumes, by decreasing the reactor temperature (reducing liquid expansion) and/or time (reducing required processing volumes) during start-up of the operation, and/or by employing similar, less volatile solvent mixtures as predicted by the steady-state simulation from the beginning of the refinery operation and/or by recycling all reaction liquor without any purification in the start-up phase.
Fig. 3 The solvent composition at the reactor inlet (left axis) and solvent inlet volumetric flow rate at reaction conditions (right axis) in function of the liquor recycling (%) (x-axis). The liquor recycling represents the percentual amount of the filtered liquid reaction mixture that is recycled back to the reactor inlet as parameterized in split 1 (see Fig. 2). The solvent volumetric flow rate at reaction conditions depends on the overall solvent composition at the reactor inlet. Fresh methanol is added to the recycled streams to maintain a constant volumetric flow of 10 L per kg dry biomass at RT. At a liquor recycling of 95% and above, the operation of the liquor recycle was found to be infeasible as this design criterion is violated (see ‘Operation of liquor recycle system’). |
The altering mass and energy balances of the RCF biorefinery at a liquor recycling of 0, 50, 70 and 90% show that the process requires less energy at a reduced load on the crude oil distillation column (Table 1). The intake of fuel (i.e., hydrogen) to produce steam decreases by 74%, from 2305 kg h−1 to 607 kg h−1, at a high liquor recycling of 70% compared to 0%. The electric power, mainly required for the cooling water pump around, shows a similar trend. Its consumption decreases by 78% (from 2107 kW to 464 kW) for a liquor recycling of 70% compared to 0%. A 3-fold decrease in water consumption between these liquor recycling rates is also illustrative for the reduced cooling demands. When 90% of the reaction liquor is recycled, much less fuel, power and cooling water is needed. The fuel consumption drops to 13 kg hydrogen h−1, excess electric power is generated (−251 kW) and cooling water input decreases almost 9-fold. However, the flue gas CO2 emissions increase to 973 kg h−1 as more methanol and methyl acetate leave the reactor and recycle area via off-gas streams which are combusted in the CHP. Part of the energy is thus provided by wood acetyls and methanol. The need for less energy at high liquor recycling is also exemplified by the ratio of the energy content of fuel and the wood heating value. The energy input without liquor recycling is equivalent to 97% of the wood heating value. This ratio decreases to 47, 26 and 0.5% at a liquor recycling of 50, 70 and 90%, respectively. Our one step distillation process with a reduced load on the distillation column at high liquor recycling performs thereby significantly better than the two-step distillation process reported earlier in which the recycling of reaction by-products and crude lignin oil was not considered. Here, the process heating for distillation alone equalled 73% of the wood heating value already.50 Note that very little hydrogen (21 kg h−1) is consumed in the RCF reaction which is much less compared to the fuel requirements of the refinery, especially at low liquor recycling (see Hydrogen (RCF) vs. Fuel (H2) in Table 1).
Liquor recycling (%) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 50% | 70% | 90% | ||
Mass streams in/out (kg h−1) | |||||
Input | Wood feedstock | 17473 | 17473 | 17473 | 17473 |
Methanol | 631 | 342 | 448 | 403 | |
Hydrogen (RCF) | 21 | 21 | 21 | 21 | |
Catalyst | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | |
Ethyl acetate | 63 | 81 | 80 | 86 | |
Water | 124224 | 68505 | 43600 | 15997 | |
Output | Lignin oil | 2879 | 2871 | 2870 | 2875 |
Pulp | 11327 | 11327 | 11327 | 11327 | |
Aqueous sugars | 278 | 287 | 297 | 287 | |
Waste | Flue gas CO2 | 585 | 608 | 647 | 973 |
Energy streams in/out | |||||
Fuel (H2) (kg h−1) | 2305 | 1126 | 607 | 13 | |
Electric power (kW) | 2107 | 979 | 464 | −251 | |
Energy input/LHV wood (%) | 97% | 47% | 26% | 0.5% |
Fig. 4 (A) Operational expenditures (OPEX) in million € per year (M€ per year) and (B) capital expenditures (CAPEX) in million € (M€) of an RCF biorefinery processing 150 kt wood per year in function of the liquor recycling. A description of the cost estimation methods is given in the Methods and materials sections. The parameters for the cost calculations of the OPEX and CAPEX are presented in Tables S5 and S6 of the ESI.† |
Fig. 5 (A) Minimum selling price of the refined lignin oil (MSP-RLO) in € per t in function of the liquor recycling. The selling price of benzene, phenol and bisphenol A were obtained from ICIS reports for the period 2019–2020.88–90 In the work of Liao et al., the selling price of the lignin oil oligomers was set to 1750 € per t to ensure an economic feasible operation of the biorefinery that also converts the lignin monomers to phenol for which a selling price of 1300 € per t was used.55 The MSP-RLO estimated by Bartling et al. amounts 1600 € per t for their base design with methanol RCF. In their design, the pulp is fermented to bio-ethanol that is sold for 500 € per t.50 The selling price of the pulp in this work was set to 400 € per t carbohydrates in the pulp similar to Liao et al.55 (B) Share of the process in- and outputs to the global warming potential of the refined lignin oil (GWP-RLO) when an electricity mix and grey hydrogen (fuel) are used as energy vectors in function of the liquor recycling, compared to the GWP of benzene, phenol and bisphenol A. These GWP values correspond to the process CO2 emissions solely and do not include negative emissions originating from biogenic carbon uptake by plant photosynthesis. GWP-RLO values when renewable electricity and green hydrogen are used as the refinery energy vectors are shown in Fig. S9 (ESI†). A description of LCA methdology is given in the Methods and materials section. The GWP parameters for the refinery in- and outputs are shown in Table S7 of the ESI.† |
When the process is operated without liquor recycling, the MSP-RLO (2261 € per t) is larger than estimated before. This can be attributed to the high costs for the fuel hydrogen and the large capital expenses. At a liquor recycling rate of ∼50%, the MSP-RLO coincides with the BPA selling price (1500 € per t) but still exceeds the selling price of phenol (1100 € per t) and benzene (400 € per t). For this price to be competitive, the added value of the lignin oil mixture should be comparable to pure BPA. This seems rather unlikely as until now, the lignin oil needs additional processing to yield monomer derived bisphenols73 or oligomers that are equivalent to BPA62 and there is no margin for this at a BPA selling price. Nevertheless, at high liquor recycling of >75%, the MSP-RLO decreases to below 1000 € per t, in between the phenol and benzene selling prices. This MSP agrees better with its role as a platform for phenolics as it allows for additional downstream processing and upgrading to chemicals equivalent to phenol, BPA and others, which have higher prices. This analysis signifies that the refinery design can become economically feasible if a high liquor recycling can be technically achieved.
We calculated the GWP-RLO at varying liquor recycling rates by leveraging the process mass and energy balances (Table 1) to the life cycle inventory of the LCA. The GWP decreases from 4.42 to 0.71 kgCO2 kgRLO−1 between a liquor recycling of 0 and 90%, which is consistent with the reduced energy requirements at a lower distillation load (Fig. 5B). This is exemplified by a decreasing footprint of the hydrogen fuel input (3.60–0.02 kgCO2 kgRLO−1). The CO2 footprint of the wood feedstock remains constant (0.45 kgCO2 kgRLO−1), but is positive, as it solely represents the CO2 emissions associated with harvesting and processing of birch trees to wood chips. At low liquor recycling the GWP-RLO exceeds the GWP of BPA (3.49 kgCO2 kg−1), but at a liquor recycling above 65%, it drops to below the GWP of phenol (2.79 kgCO2 kg−1) and benzene (1.86 kgCO2 kg−1). Here, the margin is expected to be large enough for the GWP of lignin oil derived products to increase in downstream production processes but to remain below the GWP of fossil analogues viz., phenol and BPA. The GWP-RLO is lower than the GWP of BPA, phenol, and benzene in all instances when renewable energy vectors are used (Fig. S9, ESI†). When including CO2 capture through photosynthesis under the carbon neutrality principle the GWP-RLO decreases by 4.9 kgCO2 kgRLO−1 in all instances, w/ and w/o renewable energy vectors (see Fig. S10, ESI† for the LCA system boundaries). As anticipated, the process CO2 emissions contribute considerably less, relatively to the total GWP under the carbon neutrality principle, even when using non-renewable energy vectors. Given the significance of the applied methodology on the LCA results, we intend to provide detailed life cycle calculations elaborating on the carbon neutrality principle and its impact on the LCA for all process in- and outputs, in a follow-up communication. The purpose of the work presented in this section, is to show how LCA can be usefully applied to innovate and optimize the process.
The composition of the carbohydrate pulp obtained with RCF of birch with the applied solvents are depicted in Fig. 6. With pure methanol, 62% of the lignin is extracted whereas most of the hemicellulose (88%) and virtually all cellulose are retained in the pulp. Acetyls have largely been detached from the hemicellulose as signified by a low acetyl retention of 20% (Fig. 6 – MeOH). At 0% liquor recycling, when no crude lignin oil and water are concentrated in the solvent mixture, but methyl acetate is (26 vol%), the pulp is delignified more (80% delignification) than with the pure methanol reaction while it contains a similar amount of hemicellulose and cellulose carbohydrates. Acetyl retention has increased to 30%, which could be assigned to the increasing concentration of methyl acetate in the mixture that can react with free hydroxyl groups of the pulp carbohydrates. For solvent mixtures mimicking a liquor recycling between 25% and 70%, the delignification is higher than the 0% recycle and pure methanol reactions but remains constant at 90%. The hemicellulose retention drops from 82 to 67% whilst most of the cellulose is retained in the pulp (>95%). This trend is continued for the solvent mixture mirroring a liquor recycling of 80%. The wood becomes more delignified, up to 93%, and around 50% of the hemicellulose carbohydrates are removed, whilst most of the cellulose is retained in the pulp. The presence of up to 10 vol% of crude lignin oil in the bulk reaction mixture seems not to have negatively affected the delignification which is, along with the hemicellulose co-extraction, likely promoted by the presence of water in the reaction mixture. This is largely in line with the findings of Jang et al. In their work, the delignification (93%) and hemicellulose co-extraction (80%) were promoted using solvent mixtures containing crude lignin oil (8 wt%), methanol and water (at 1 v/v-ratio) whilst they remained constant (56% and 8%, respectively), and comparable to a pure methanol reaction, when only crude lignin oil was enriched – up to 8 wt% – in the methanol solvent. Above 8 wt% crude lignin oil, they also observed an increased delignification likely due to the presence of some water in the solvent mixture.48 The effect of water,33,36 seen here already at low concentrations (1–9 vol%), might have been reinforced through the presence of methyl acetate and acetic acid, leading to more acidic conditions in the reaction liquor and consequently, a higher delignification and a larger co-extraction of hemicellulose.39 This effect seems to be even more pronounced at the highest liquor recycling of 90% when the solvent mixture is highly enriched with crude lignin oil (21 vol%), water (17 vol%), methyl acetate (21 vol%) and acetic acid (3 vol%). In these harsher reaction conditions, 90% of the hemicellulose is dissolved and even 20% of the cellulose carbohydrates are removed from the wood. The delignification extent drops slightly to 85% which is likely attributed to lignin oil redeposition on the pulp and not to a decreased lignin extraction from the wood as can be inferred from the resulting lignin oil properties (see below). This suggest that there is an upper limit of the lignin oil concentration with respect to minimizing the lignin content of the carbohydrate pulp.
Fig. 6 Pulp mass and composition relative to the birch wood feedstock for RCF with pure methanol (MeOH) and with solvent mixtures comprising methanol, methyl acetate, acetic acid, water and crude lignin oil corresponding to a liquor recycling between 0% and 90%. RCF reactions conditions: 4 g birch sawdust (pre-extracted, particle size 0.25–0.50 mm), 0.4 g of 5% Pd/C, 40 mL solvent (at RT), 220 °C, 30 bar H2 (at RT) and reaction time of 2 h. The solvent compositions at varying liquor recycling are shown in Fig. 3 and summarized in Table S2 (ESI†). The solvent volume was kept constant to 40 mL (at RT) for all reactions by assuming an CLO density of 0.9 g cm−3, which was modelled by group contribution theory for mixtures of the CLO molecules with Aspen®. |
The results of the pulp compositional analysis show that the delignification is improved with the applied solvent mixtures compared to pure methanol. To examine how these conditions have impacted lignin depolymerization and stabilization, the lignin oil was analysed after removal of sugars, which were traced back in the water-soluble fraction as methylated monomers and/or polyols after liquid–liquid extraction with ethyl acetate and water (Fig. S12, ESI†). Fig. 7A depicts the yield of the syringyl-type monomeric units relative to the birch protolignin (i.e., the S-monomer yield). The S-monomer yield of the lignin oil obtained with RCF mirroring conditions at 0, 25 and 50% liquor recycling is ∼5% smaller compared to the RCF reaction with pure methanol (19%). Methyl acetate seems to have adversely affected monomer formation whereas it has promoted lignin extraction, as indicated by the higher degree of delignification for RCF at 0% liquor recycling (78%) compared to the pure methanol reaction (62%). The impact of crude lignin oil seems to be negligible when concentrated to 1 and 2 vol% in the solvent mixture at 25% and 50% liquor recycling, respectively. For the reactions mirroring a high liquor recycling of 70 and 80%, the S-monomer yield has increased to 20% which is comparable to pure methanol RCF. Remarkably, the formation of syringyl type monomers further increases to 24% of the birch protolignin when the solvent mixture contains a large amount of crude lignin oil, namely 21 vol% at 90% liquor recycling. As for the delignification extent, the monomer yield increases when water and acetic acid become more concentrated in the solvent mixture, which is in line with previous reports on the effect of water and acid on the monomer yield in hardwood RCF,33,39 and it is not adversely affected by the presence of dissolved crude lignin oil. The slightly lower delignification for the 90% liquor recycling reaction seems to contradict this observation. Even though the delignification for this reaction has decreased, the S-monomer yield did not, which prompts us to assume that the dissolved lignin, either originating from the biomass or solubilized in the solvent mixture has redeposited on the pulp rather than that less of the birch protolignin has been extracted and depolymerized. In contrast to reports of Jang et al., monomer formation is not impeded when large amounts of lignin (i.e., more than 4 wt% in their work) are present in the solvent mixture, which they attributed to an increased competition for adsorption on the catalyst surface. Nonetheless, it must be noted that the catalyst in this work is Pd/C instead of Ni/C in theirs. The ability of Pd to assist in the lignin depolymerization through catalytic hydrogenolysis in addition to its hydrogenation capacity stabilizing reactive lignin fragments might explain the higher monomer formation with Pd- than with Ni-catalysis, which is suspected to perform the latter only.29 This point is currently subject of a more in-depth mechanistic study. In addition, the guaiacyl-type lignin oil of spruce might have a lower tendency to adsorb on the catalyst surface compared to syringyl-type lignin from birch,76 thereby weakening the effect of lignin enrichment on the catalyst activity, but this hypothesis seems less likely as substantially more lignin is dissolved in the solvent mixture without showing a detrimental effect compared to their experiments.48
As reported earlier, RCF with methanol, a Pd/C catalyst and birch feedstock is highly selective to 4-n-propanolsyringol (POHS) with a limited formation of 4-n-propylsyringol (PS) and has a comparable monomer selectivity of 44% (Fig. 7B – MeOH). The addition of methyl acetate and/or acetic acid induces the formation of 3-(4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxyphenyl)propylacetate, hereafter referred to as 4-n-propylacetatesyringol (POAcS), presumably by a partial acetylation of the propanol side chain of POHS. The degree of side-chain acetylation increases for the reactions with more water and acetic acid present – at 70% liquor recycling and above – likely due to an increased acidity of the reaction mixture catalysing the esterification reactions (Fig. 7A). Acetylation of the propanol side chain also occurs with the guaiacyl-type (G-type) monomers. For example, the refined lignin oil obtained with RCF at 0% liquor recycling contains 9% 4-n-propanolguaiacol (POHG) and 0.5% 4-n-propylacetateguaiacol (POAcG) (Fig. 7B and Fig. S13, ESI†). POAcG becomes increasingly present in the lignin oils obtained with the solvent mixtures containing more spruce crude lignin oil. This signifies that also POHG originally present in the solvent mixture, has been acetylated during RCF of birch wood. Here it is also clearly shown that the spruce lignin oil has been enriched with birch lignin oil given the presence of S-type monomers and the intermediate monomer yields between those of the spruce (30%), and pure birch (43%) lignin oil. At increasing liquor recycling, the total monomer yield of the lignin oils becomes closer to these of the spruce than the birch lignin oil as the contribution of birch lignin to the overall lignin oil weight obviously decreases.
These findings are confirmed by analysis of the refined lignin oils with gel permeation chromatography (GPC), used here to determine the molecular weight (Mw) distribution of the oils. Typical molecular weight distributions of RCF lignin oils containing phenolic monomers, dimers, trimers, and oligomers were obtained which signifies that the depolymerization of lignin and stabilization of reactive monomers has occurred (Fig. S14, ESI†). Given the subtle differences between the various oils, we calculated the number average (Mn) and weight average (Mw) molecular weight from these profiles for comparison (Table 2). The Mn and Mw of the lignin oil for a 0% liquor recycling reaction have increased beyond these of the birch lignin oil obtained with pure methanol (356 g mol−1 and 596 g mol−1). The molecular weights of the 25% liquor recycling reactions and higher have also surpassed these of the pristine spruce lignin oil (Mn of 405 g mol−1 and Mw of 631 g mol−1). These molecular weight shifts can be explained in multiple ways: (i) a higher delignification of high-Mw lignin combined with (ii) a hindered depolymerization and/or an increased re-condensation might have increased the average molecular weights of the lignin oils between 0 and 50% liquor recycling. The latter seems less likely at 70% liquor recycling and above as S-monomer formation continues to increase for these reactions. Molecular weights might also have increased by (iii) acetylation of both the birch lignin oil, formed during the reaction and the spruce lignin oil, initially added to the solvent mixture. The relatively large presence of acetylated G-type monomers in the lignin oils at high liquor recycling confirms this (Fig. 7B). Hereby, it is possible that also lignin oil dimers and oligomers have been acetylated during reaction, as they have propanol side chains and usually more than one – as shown by detailed molecular analysis of dimers and trimers by Van Aelst et al.43 and Dao Thi et al.77 – available for esterification with acetates. Finally, (iv) recondensation of spruce lignin might also have occurred thereby increasing the molecular weights of the lignin oils, but this was not unambiguously determined here.
Lignin oil | M n (g mol−1) | M w (g mol−1) | PDI |
---|---|---|---|
Spruce RLO | 405 | 631 | 1.56 |
MeOH (birch) | 356 | 596 | 1.67 |
0% recycling | 396 | 725 | 1.83 |
25% recycling | 426 | 712 | 1.67 |
50% recycling | 438 | 731 | 1.67 |
70% recycling | 463 | 794 | 1.71 |
80% recycling | 473 | 827 | 1.75 |
90% recycling | 468 | 820 | 1.75 |
Fig. 8A and B depict the MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO at various liquor recycling rates for the base case (circles) simulations and the simulations w/ feedback (diamonds). The results are shown in pairs. The labels introduced above in italics, are further used to simplify the description of the results. At a 0% liquor recycling in the base case an identical solvent composition is obtained at 0% liquor recycling w/ feedback, as no crude lignin oil and water are enriched in the solvent mixture. Yet, the MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO decrease as more lignin oil is produced while the capital and operational costs do not change. For the higher recycling rates in the base case, the solvent composition and flow rate match their original values at a lower liquor recycling w/ feedback, and the gap between these recycling rates increases at higher liquor recycling. As the experiments show that more lignin and hemicellulose are extracted from the biomass with the simulated solvent mixtures obtained at a high liquor recycling (w/ feedback) than with pure methanol (base case) the enrichment of a similar amount of crude lignin oil in the solvent mixture occurs already at lower liquor recycling. For example, the solvent composition for a liquor recycling of 25% in the base case corresponds to a solvent composition for a recycling rate of 22.5% w/ feedback, whereas a recycling rate of 80% in the base case, corresponds to 67% w/ feedback. In most of the cases shown here, part of the make-up methanol had to be replaced by water to obtain a similar solvent composition in the simulation as in the experiment as less water is recycled to the reactor (Table S3, ESI†). The feasible range of liquor recycling w/ feedback has also decreased as the design criterion of 10 L kg−1 at RT for the solvent-to-biomass ratio is violated already at recycling rates below 90%.
Fig. 8 (A) MSP-RLO and (B) GWP-RLO in function of the liquor recycling. The liquor recycling in the base case i.e., with a formation and consumption of products and reagents according to the standard pure methanol RCF reaction are represented by the circles and the trends are shown by the dotted lines (base case) – see also Fig. 5. The liquor recycling obtained when experimental results are implemented in the process simulation are represented by the diamonds and the trends are shown by the solid lines (w/ feedback). Pairs for which the solvent composition matches in both instances are given the same colour. The liquor recycling rates of the pairs are tabulated in Table S3 of the ESI.† |
Trendlines were plotted in Fig. 8A and B to reveal the general behaviour of the MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO in function of the liquor recycling when experimental feedback is provided to the process model. Previously showing a linearly, continuously decreasing trend from low to high liquor recycling in the base case (see also Fig. 5), the MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO now bend-off at high liquor recycling w/ feedback. At low liquor recycling, the estimated MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO w/ feedback are lower compared to base case as more lignin oil is produced whilst a similar liquor recycling rate can be maintained. This gap, between the MSP and GWP estimates of the base case and w/ feedback, decreases with increasing liquor recycling as the lignin oil productivity plateaus as was shown experimentally (Fig. 7). The additional benefit of a larger lignin extraction with the solvent mixtures at these higher liquor recycling rates diminishes. As result, the trendlines coincide at a liquor recycling of ∼75%. Above 80% liquor recycling w/ feedback, the operation becomes infeasible due to a violation of the solvent-to-biomass design criterion of 10 L kg−1 at RT (see ‘Operation of the liquor recycle system’). The estimates of these performance indicators show that liquor recycling remains a useful strategy to improve the economics and sustainability of the RCF biorefinery process. The MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO are still competitive compared to fossil-based analogues like phenol and BPA.
The delignification extent decreases from 93% to 81% and the hemicellulose retention increases from 54% to 69%, respectively, when the residence time for this RCF reaction is halved from 2 h to 1 h at a reaction temperature of 220 °C. Although substantially more lignin is extracted from the biomass at these conditions compared to the RCF reaction with pure methanol (62% delignification), less monomers are formed as shown by the reduced S-monomer yield, which decreases from 21 to 14%, below the S-monomer yield of a pure methanol reaction (19%) (Fig. 9A and B). Likely, the lignin extracted from the wood matrix has not been depolymerized fully after 1 h of reaction time, suggesting that the lignin extraction rate might be larger than the rate of depolymerization with this reaction system and at these conditions. This is confirmed by GPC analysis of the lignin oil. The Mn (483 g mol−1) and Mw (873 g mol−1) are larger than at a reaction time of 2 h (473 and 827 g mol−1) implying that depolymerization is incomplete. Reducing the reaction temperature to 200 °C has a similar effect on the RCF performance metrics as halving the reactor residence time: less lignin is extracted (70% delignification) but the delignification remains larger than that of a pure methanol reaction, and the S-monomer yield (11%) is smaller compared to the reaction at 220 °C and decreases to below the monomer yield of pure methanol RCF. The Mn (472 g mol−1) and Mw (850 g mol−1) are comparable with the RCF reaction at 220 °C. The hemicellulose retention has also increased, to 78%. For both reactions, deacetylation of the hemicellulose has decreased somewhat (∼10%) compared to the reaction at 220 °C and 2 h, likely due to an increased hemicellulose retention. The GC and GPC spectra of the lignin oil and the GC spectrum of the aqueous phase are depicted by Fig. S18–S20 in the ESI.†
Fig. 9 (A) Pulp mass and composition relative to the birch wood feedstock and (B) monomer yield of the syringyl-type monomeric units vs. pristine birch lignin content (left axis) and the degree of delignification (right axis) for RCF reactions with varying reaction time and temperature. The solvent composition for these reactions is shown in Fig. S21 (ESI†). Standard reaction conditions, except for time and temperature, were used (see caption Fig. 6). (C) capital costs distribution (D) operational costs distribution and (E) GWP-RLO (left axis) and MSP-RLO (right axis) for the process operating at varying RCF reaction time and temperature. The modelling results are obtained by re-implementation of the experimental results in the process simulation (see ‘Implementing the experimental results in the process model’). |
The economics and sustainability for the RCF biorefinery systems with a lower reactor residence time and reaction temperature were re-evaluated after implementation of the experimental results in the process simulation. Liquor recycling rates and the make-up solvent composition were adjusted from the initial 80% to match the inlet solvent composition of the simulations with the solvent composition used in experiments as closely as possible (Fig. S21, ESI†). It must be noted that the lower deacetylation of the wood at the lower reaction time and temperature has led to a somewhat lower concentration of methyl acetate in the solvent composition in the simulations than used in the experiments as the make-up solvent was only modified by addition of water. However, these differences are limited and not expected to impact the reaction performance substantially as can be inferred from previous experiments (see ‘Impact of liquor recycling’).
As expected, the reactor capital costs decrease from 87 M€ for the 220 °C–2 h case to 50 M€ for the 220 °C–1 h case and to 60 M€ for the 200 °C–2 h case (Fig. 9C). The capital costs for distillation and the CHP also decrease as the liquor recycling can be set higher to 73% and 76%, respectively, instead of 67% before a similar composition is attained at the inlet solvent stream due to the lower (crude) lignin oil productivity in both reactions (Fig. 9B). This also impacts the fuel costs required for distillation and the ethyl acetate purchasing costs. Less liquid is distilled, and less ethyl acetate is consumed in the liquid–liquid extraction due to the lower crude lignin oil production. Operational costs also decline in both cases as the fixed costs of production (e.g., maintenance, property tax, etc.), which are partially estimated based on the capital costs, decrease (Fig. 9D). Despite a lower lignin oil productivity, these costs reductions are significantly large enough to decrease the lignin oil selling price and carbon footprint. The MSP-RLO declines from 1089 to 784 and 875 € per t for the 1 h and the 200 °C case, respectively. The GWP-RLO drops slightly from 1.60 to 1.48 and 1.47 kgCO2 kgRLO−1 (Fig. 9E). As discussed in previous section, economic parameters such as the pulp and carbohydrate pricing were kept constant in these MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO calculations to examine the impact on lignin oil independently (see ‘Implementing the experimental results in the process model’). In general, this analysis shows that the technical variables (viz., reaction time, temperature, liquor recycling, etc.) are strongly interdependent and all impact the economics and environmental impact of the RCF biorefinery.
Fig. 10 (A) Pulp mass and composition relative to the spruce wood feedstock (Spruce) and (B) monomer composition of the lignin oil (left axis) and degree of delignification (right axis) for an RCF reaction with pure methanol (MeOH) and for a RCF reaction with solvent composition corresponding to a liquor recycling rate of 80% in the base case (80% recycle). The solvent composition for this reaction is shown in Fig. 11a. Standard reaction conditions (220 °C, 2 h, 10 L kg−1) were used in these spruce RCF reactions (see also caption Fig. 6). |
Fig. 11 (A) Solvent composition (left axis) and volumetric flow rate (right axis) (B) GWP-RLO (left axis) and MSP-RLO (right axis) for the RCF process using birch and spruce as feedstock and using a solvent mixture in RCF modelled at a liquor recycling of 80% in the base case. The modelling results shown here are obtained by reimplementing the experimental results (see Fig. 10) in the process simulation (see ‘Implementing the experimental results in the process model’). An identical feedstock price was used for spruce as for birch. |
The capital and operational costs of the RCF biorefinery processing spruce are fairly similar to the comparable case with birch. Capital costs amount 123 M€, with the reactor being the largest cost contributor (87 M€) and the operational cost amount 49 M€ per year whereby some costs (e.g., the methanol and ethyl acetate purchasing costs) are smaller and others (e.g., fuel costs) are larger when using spruce feedstock due to small differences in the operation of the refinery. On one hand, less ethyl acetate and methanol are required for the crude lignin oil extraction and solvent make-up, respectively, as the crude lignin oil productivity is lower, and less methanol is consumed in a spruce RCF reaction. On the other hand, more fuel is needed due to the larger concentration of methanol (67 vs. 51 wt%) in the distillation inlet stream (Fig. S23a, ESI†) which has a similar flow rate for the spruce and birch case given the comparable liquor recycling rate (69% and 67.5%) obtained after reimplementation of the experimental results. Due to the lower lignin oil production in RCF, the MSP-RLO is higher for the spruce (1228 € per t) than for the birch (1089 € per t) case. The increased GWP-RLO for spruce (1.88 kgCO2 kgRLO−1) compared to birch (1.60 kgCO2 kgRLO−1) is explained in a similar way as the operational costs (Fig. 11B).
Fig. 12 (A) Pulp mass and composition relative to the birch wood feedstock (Birch) (B) monomer yield of the syringyl-type monomeric units vs. pristine birch lignin content (left axis) and the degree of delignification (right axis) for an RCF reaction with pure methanol (MeOH) and for an RCF reaction with solvent composition corresponding to a liquor recycling rate of 80% obtained for the birch feedstock containing 15% moisture (15% MC) and 30% moisture (30% MC). The solvent composition for these reaction is shown in Fig. 13a. Standard reaction conditions were used (see caption Fig. 6). |
The economics and environmental footprint of the process were re-evaluated using the TEA and LCA models after implementation of the experimental results in the process simulation and readjustment of the liquor recycling and the make-up solvent composition. The reactor capital costs are substantially smaller for the case with 30% MC (77 M€) than for 15% MC (87 M€) as the solvent mixture entering the reactor is less volatile due the larger presence of water. This leads to an overall lower capital cost of 114 M€ for the 30% MC vs. 124 M€ for the 15% MC case. Operational costs are mainly impacted by the larger fuel requirements (7.1 vs. 6 M€ per year) for removing methanol from the distillation inlet stream which contains more water, and the increased purchasing costs for ethyl acetate (5.4 vs. 3.9 M€ per year) which is lost more to the aqueous stream due to the larger amounts of water entering the liquid–liquid extraction. In this case, it might be interesting to adjust the amount of water before entry in the extractor to reduce these losses, but only if that leads to improved economics of the process. The operational costs for the 30% MC (53 M€ per year) have increased by 3 M€ per year compared to the similar case with 15% MC (50 M€ per year). The reduced capital costs and increased operational costs lead to an estimated MSP-RLO that is similar in both cases. The MSP-RLO amounts 1113 € per t for the 30% MC case which is just 46 € per t more than the estimate of 1089 € per t for 15% MC. The GWP-RLO has increased from 1.60 to 1.89 kgCO2 kgRLO−1, which is mainly due to the larger fuel and ethyl acetate intake (Fig. 13B). Importantly, we did not alter the price or global warming potential of the wood feedstock even though this might be required for woods with a higher moisture content. The cost and carbon footprint could be larger due to the transportation of heavier wood. However, as the drying of wood is a large contributor (20%) to the feedstock price,69 it can be expected that the MSP-RLO can be further reduced when using wood with a larger moisture content.
Fig. 13 (A) Solvent composition (left axis) and volumetric flow rate (right axis) (B) GWP-RLO (left axis) and MSP-RLO (right axis) for the RCF process using birch feedstock containing 15% moisture (15% MC birch) and 30% moisture (30% MC birch) and using a solvent mixture in RCF modelled at a liquor recycling of 80% in the base case. The modelling results are obtained by reimplementing the experimental results (see Fig. 12) in the process simulation (see ‘Implementing the experimental results in the process model’). |
Unique solvent mixtures comprising (i) methanol, (ii) methyl acetate and (iii) acetic acid, formed by deacetylation of hemicellulose, (iv) water, released from the wood matrix and, (v) the crude lignin oil, were obtained by partially returning the RCF reaction liquor to the reactor before a crude distillation step (i.e., liquor recycling) and by allowing reaction by-products such as methyl acetate to concentrate in the solvent recycle loop following a crude distillation step to remove the crude lignin oil and excess water (i.e., solvent recycling).
Simulation of this RCF biorefinery process at multiple steady-state operations whereby the liquor recycling percentage was systematically varied showed that the process economics and CO2 footprint can be significantly improved in this way as excessive solvent distillation is avoided. This proof-of-concept process model was corroborated by and adjusted with the results of lab-scale experiments that mimic the newly simulated RCF solvent mixtures. It was demonstrated that by using solvent mixtures containing methanol, methyl acetate, water, acetic acid, and crude lignin oil (to up to 20 vol%) – as simulated for a high liquor recycling – the lignin extraction is enhanced, the monomer yield remains high, and the hemicellulose co-extraction is promoted. This leads to an overall lower MSP-RLO and reduces the GWP-RLO significantly, levelling the selling price of phenol and the GWP of benzene (Fig. 14 – Liquor recycling).
The RCF biorefinery economics were optimized further by lowering the reactor capital costs which was achieved by reducing the reactor residence time and reaction temperature for a solvent mixture at high liquor recycling. Despite the somewhat lower lignin oil productivity at these ‘milder’ conditions, the MSP-RLO could be further reduced to below the price of phenol (Fig. 14 – Reactor cost optimization).
Finally, the general applicability of this process concept was demonstrated by applying the modelling and experimental procedures developed in this work to different feedstocks. The process remains functional i.e., the recycle system proves useful when switching from hardwood to softwood but the composition of the solvent mixtures at varying liquor recycling changes. When using spruce instead of birch, the solvent mixtures contain less acetates and crude lignin oil, given the lower productivity of these compounds in the RCF reaction. In line with the birch case, the lignin oil yield is enhanced when liquor recycling is applied leading to a spruce MSP-RLO levelling the phenol selling price and GWP-RLO equal to benzene (Fig. 14 – Spruce feedstock). It was also shown that woods with a higher moisture content can be processed by the biorefinery whilst maintaining a similar MSP-RLO and GWP-RLO as the corresponding case with lower moisture content (Fig. 14 – 30% MC birch). Overall, the methodologies developed in this work can be further applied to optimize the reaction conditions, explore other feedstock types as well as other solvent systems in developing an economically feasible and environmentally sustainable lignin-first RCF biorefinery.
Tabulated data of all figures can be found in the Tables section of the ESI† (Tables S8–S33).
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Detailed experimental procedures; supplementary figures and tables. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ee00965c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |