Saad
Zafar
a,
Santosh K.
Singh
*b and
Bimlesh
Lochab
*a
aMaterials Chemistry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, Delhi-NCR-201314, India. E-mail: bimlesh.lochab@snu.edu.in
bElectrochemical-Energy Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar Institution of Eminence, Delhi-NCR-201314, India. E-mail: santosh.singh1@snu.edu.in
First published on 2nd May 2023
Electrochemical energy storage devices, including supercapacitors and metal-ion batteries, are some of the most sustainable energy technologies. The advancement of layered materials constantly improves the charge storage capacity of these devices by facilitating the intercalation/de-intercalation mechanism. In the present study, we have prepared a PANI/VS2 composite material using a facile method and used it to fabricate quasi-solid-state supercapacitors (QSSCs) and zinc ion batteries (ZIBs). In situ growth of PANI on the layered VS2 improved the conductivity and charge acceptor sites during the cycling process. The PANI/VS2 composite showed an specific capacitance of 822 F g−1 at 2 A g−1 discharge current density due to the pseudocapacitance contribution from PANI. In addition, the observed nanowire network of PANI over the VS2 surface facilitated the electrolyte accessibility. The assembled ZIB, with PANI/VS2 as the cathode, showed a charge storage capacity of 219 mA h g−1 at a discharge rate of 0.1 A g−1 with a coulombic efficiency of ∼100% after 750 continuous cycles at 3 A g−1. The observed higher charge storage capacity and the cycling reversibility of the devices are attributed to the robustness of the prepared PANI/VS2 composite material.
In recent years, supercapacitors (SCs) have attracted considerable attention due to their fast charge–discharge rates, high power density, and long cycle lifetime. However, issues of low energy density ascribed to their different energy-storage mechanisms still hinder their practical applications.6 Compared to supercapacitors the aqueous rechargeable metal-ion batteries conceives better charge storage capacity owing to the reversible shuttling of metal ions such as Zn2+ in zinc-ion batteries (ZIBs).7 The abundant availability of zinc naturally and its lower reduction potential of −0.78 V vs. SHE enable zinc to be an attractive anode material for aqueous metal-ion batteries.8,9 Considering the importance of the electrode materials in SC and ZIB cathodes, the development of a high-surface area materials with improved conductivity is of high priority.9 Advancements in porous carbon materials and transition metal oxides led to improved intercalation of metal ions, increasing the overall storage capacity output.10,11 However, the achieved charge storage capacity is still far from realizing the theoretical capacity offered by the SCs and ZIBs. Thus, exploring layered and stable materials as charged ion acceptors is one of the best methods for these applications.
Layered transition-metal dichalcogenides (TMDs), such as MoS2, WS2, and VS2, have received significant attention in various applications due to their outstanding characteristics.11–14 TMDs possess a graphene-like layered structure with a direct bandgap, which facilitates fast ion diffusion. The associated properties of TMDs enable them to be a potential electrode material for electrochemical energy applications. TMD-based electrodes showed excellent activity towards SCs and Li/Na-ion batteries.12,14,15 This class of materials also showed great potential for the insertion/extraction of multivalent ions (Zn2+, Mg2+, and Al3+) owing to the characteristic of large interlayer spacing.16,17 VS2 is a hexagonal system, and shows a similar crystal structure to that of graphite with an interlayer spacing of 5.76 Å, in which the vanadium layer lies between two sulfur layers forming a sandwich structure.14,18 In the VS2 crystal structure, each V atom is arranged around six S atoms via covalent connections. The large interlayer spacing of VS2 enables ease of insertion/extraction of lithium ions (0.69 Å), sodium ions (1.02 Å), and zinc ions (0.74 Å) as such, or as solvated ions in an aqueous electrolyte. However, the lower conductivity of VS2 compared to that of graphitic carbon materials has limited its applicability in energy storage devices.
The conductivity of VS2 layered materials can be improved by adding conducting additives such as carbon and conducting polymers.19,20 In this study, polyaniline (PANI) nanofibers are grown over VS2 layers, and the resulting composite was used as an active material with improved overall conductivity.
Wang et al.21 reported the capacitance of layered VS2 as 105 F g−1, while VS2 was prepared using a solvothermal method, followed by layer separation achieved by the sonication method. The capacitance reported for the layer-separated VS2 materials was mainly contributed by the electrical double-layer capacitance (EDLC). The observed value is lower than most of the carbon-based layered conducting materials. PANI/VS2 composite materials are not well explored for electrochemical energy storage devices in the literature. Furthermore, studies are limited to only a 3-electrode set-up using liquid electrolytes, far from the real-time application of the electrode materials in quasi-solid-state supercapacitor devices. The prepared PANI/VS2 composite electrode in SCs can store energy by ion adsorption and a surface redox reaction, as in double-layer capacitors and pseudocapacitors. Incorporating PANI into the layered VS2 offers several advantages over other pseudocapacitive materials, such as high theoretical capacitance, flexibility to alter its chemical and structural properties, and cost-effectiveness.20 Bulk PANI interacts with electrolytes inadequately and thus increases the inactive surface area available for the electrochemical reactions, thus leading to reduced specific capacitance. Alternatively, controlled polymerization of aniline over layered VS2 surfaces may form interconnected channels, enhancing ion transport and accessibility within VS2 layers and PANI, eventually boosting the overall capacitance.22
Likewise, the high storage capacity of ZIBs is hampered due to the relatively large hydration and high polarization of bivalent zinc ions leading to sluggish diffusion kinetics and is considered one of the major challenges to meet the commercial requirements. The poor mobility and accessibility of the cathode materials are desired to mitigate some of these issues, in particular, the limited accessibility of Zn2+ ions to the stacked VS2 layers, the lack of ion acceptors at the cathode, and the low energy density of ZIBs. Recently, Fu et al.23 reported a highly reversible ZIB by employing PANI as the cathode material with >99.9% coulombic efficiency. However, the typical interfacial parasitic activity, hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), and corrosion, associated with the use of an aqueous electrolyte during charge–discharge cycles, are observed. In ZIBs, the H+ and Zn2+ ion insertion kinetics in the cathode primarily depends on the components, crystallographic polymorphs, and the particle size of the active materials.24 Studies showed that the insertion of H+ ions improves the ZIB performance and facilitates the Zn2+ ion mobility. To improve the H+ ion insertion, employing a proton conducting Nafion® membrane as a separator can facilitate the efficient ion transport.25 In addition, pseudocapacitive faradaic processes are also an important factor in enhancing the charge storage capacity and rate capability of the batteries. Therefore, adding PANI to the layered VS2 electrode materials may improve the fast charge transfer kinetics and rate capability. It is well understood that the CO and N–H functional groups present in the cathode materials can accept and accommodate high Zn2+ amounts and allow reversibility, thus improving the overall cyclability of the batteries.
Understanding the advantages of VS2 and PANI as electrode materials, we have synthesized a PANI/VS2 composite, which has shown a remarkable performance in a quasi-solid-state supercapacitor (QSSC) and ZIB. The fabricated QSSC and ZIB showed a charge storage capacity of 822 F g−1 at 2 A g−1 and 219 mA h g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 discharge rate. The PANI/VS2 composite-based fabricated devices displayed enhanced performance compared to the pristine VS2 and PANI alone, showcasing the importance of the layered structure of VS2 and the conducting PANI.
The field-emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) images of pristine PANI (Fig. 1(a) and (b)) showed agglomerated structures resulting from the bulk polymerization of aniline monomers, restricting the accessibility of electrolyte ions. In contrast, pristine VS2 showed 3-dimensional nanoflakes with relatively porous morphology (Fig. 1(c) and (d)), which may enable an active scaffold and provide a large surface area to form the PANI/VS2 composite. Fig. 1(e) and (f) displays the FESEM images of PANI/VS2, showing a thin layer coating of PANI over VS2 nanoflakes with minimal destruction of the 3D structure of VS2. Interestingly, thread-like structures are noticed, inferring nano-wiring of PANI with the VS2 nanoflakes. Furthermore, the network-induced surface roughness is expected to improve the overall conductivity of the PANI/VS2 nanocomposite material, enabling it to be suitable for electrochemical applications.
The additional structural information of the PANI/VS2 composite was obtained from transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis (Fig. 2). Fig. 2(a) shows the TEM image of the PANI/VS2 composite displaying the layered structure of VS2 along with the PANI network. The inset of Fig. 2(a) shows the low-magnification image of the composite displaying the coexistence of PANI and VS2. An estimated lattice distance of 0.57 nm stands for the existence of the VS2 phase (Fig. 2(b)). The observed circular pattern of the selected area electron diffraction (SAED) patterns indicates the amorphous nature of the composite material (Fig. 2(b), inset). In addition, the uniform distribution of PANI nanowires over the VS2 surface confirms the strong interaction between the two. Furthermore, the uniform distribution of C, N, V, and S elements across the entire area observed in the EDS mapping analysis (Fig. 2(c)–(g)) suggests the coexistence of PANI and VS2 in the composite structure. The surface area and pore size distribution of the prepared materials were determined by N2 gas adsorption/desorption analysis (Fig. 3(a) and Fig. S1a, ESI†). The isotherm curves exhibited type IV characteristics, indicating the existence of a mesoporous structure.26
Expectedly, 3-dimensional VS2 nanoflakes displayed the lowest surface area of 35.11 m2 g−1, mostly contributed by their 3D structure.27 Despite the agglomerated structure of pristine PANI, it still revealed the largest surface area of 58.5 m2 g−1 and pore size distribution of 3.07 nm, confirming a mesoporous structure. Because of the in situ growth of PANI on VS2, the surface area increased in the PANI/VS2 composite (55.3 m2 g−1), which is close to that of pristine PANI. Moreover, PANI/VS2 displayed a relatively narrow pore size distribution with an average pore diameter of 3.8 nm. Interestingly, the PANI/VS2 composite benefited by incorporating the best properties from either side. Furthermore, the PANI nanowire interconnected structures in the composite enabled a large internal surface area, prompted a more regular hierarchical pore size of the composite, and expanded the contact space between the electrolyte solution and the energy storage material. The content of PANI in the PANI/VS2 composite was analyzed by TGA as shown in Fig. S1b (ESI†). A small weight loss of ∼3 wt% observed before 150 °C is attributed to the loss of surface water. The sharp weight loss between 150 °C and 350 °C in VS2 is associated with the decomposition of sulfur. The weight loss process occurs in PANI/VS2 from 150–500 °C, originating from the burning of sulfur and PANI. Therefore, the total PANI content in the PANI/VS2 composite was estimated to be 40.7 wt%.
The stacked X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of VS2, PANI, and PANI/VS2 are shown in Fig. 3(b). The diffraction peaks of VS2 at 15.8° and 36.2° correspond to the (001) and (101) planes of the hexagonal structured VS2 (JCPDS no. 01-089-1640)28 and the unassigned peaks in the range of 2θ (20–30°) correspond to the elemental sulfur (JCPDS no. 00-024-0733). However, in the PANI/VS2 composite, the diffraction peaks for VS2 were relatively suppressed, ascribed to the high loading of amorphous PANI. The characteristic well-resolved diffraction peaks at 14.8 (011), 21.0 (020), and 25.6 (200) for PANI are visible in the PANI/VS2 composite.29 Furthermore, VS2, PANI, and the PANI/VS2 composite were analyzed by Raman spectroscopy, as shown in Fig. 3(c). The Raman spectrum of VS2 showed five peaks at 140.4, 282.0, 406.6, 687.8, and 993.2 cm−1, corresponding to the rocking and stretching vibrations of V–S bonds or their combination.16 After growing PANI over VS2, several new peaks appeared, corresponding to the coated PANI in the composite. The observed peaks at 414 and 518 cm−1 are assigned to the out-of-plane bending of the PANI rings. The peaks at 582 and 811 cm−1 are characteristics of the benzenoid ring deformation and out-of-plane vibrations of aromatic rings, respectively. The observed peaks at 1166, 1223 and 1257, 1336, 1484, 1589, and 1626 cm−1 correspond to the C–H, C–N, C–N+, CN (di-imine units), CC, and C–C, respectively.30 The obvious presence of the PANI peaks in PANI/VS2 supports the idea that PANI nanowires are uniformly grown covering the entire surface of the VS2 nanoflakes.
The structural properties and composition of VS2 and the PANI/VS2 composite are confirmed by the X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, as shown in Fig. 3(d)–(f). The XPS analysis of the PANI/VS2 composite provided information about the composition, chemical state, and possible interactions between VS2 and PANI. The comparative survey scan XPS spectra of VS2 and PANI/VS2 (Fig. 3(d)) showed the existence of C, N, O, V, and S elements. The C, N, and O peaks mainly arise from PANI, whereas V and S are contributed by VS2. The deconvoluted V 2p spectra (Fig. 3(e)) showed the presence of V4+ peaks in the range of binding energy (BE) (512–528 eV). The observed peaks of VS2 at BEs of 517.1 and 524.5 eV correspond to the V 2p3/2 and V 2p1/2 of V4+, showing that V4+ species are dominant components which are slightly shifted to 516.3 eV and 523.6 eV in the case of PANI/VS2. In addition, the two peaks at BEs of 513.9 and 521.6 eV are attributed to the V–N bond formed due to the anchoring of polyaniline at VS2.21,31 A noticeable shift in the BE of V peaks observed for pristine VS2 and PANI/VS2 validates strong electronic interaction between the VS2 and PANI in the synthesized composite material. In the high-resolution XPS spectrum of S 2p in the PANI/VS2 composite (Fig. 3(f)), the major peaks are located at 162.6 (2p3/2) and 163.8 (2p1/2), which show a small shift in BE compared to S 2p peaks of pristine VS2 at 162.5 (2p3/2) and 163.7 eV (2p1/2) of S2−. The peaks at 161.6 and 167.2 eV are due to the S2−2p3/2 and C–SOx–N respectively, confirming the interaction between VS2 and PANI.21,32 The above physical characterization of the prepared materials validates that the PANI nanowires are uniformly coated on the surface of VS2. The interaction between PANI nanowires and VS2 provides excellent interfacial contact and is expected to improve the electrochemical performances in electrochemical energy devices.
Furthermore, the layered VS2 showed a dominant double-layer capacitive behavior as compared to the characteristic pseudocapacitive nature of PANI. On the other hand, the composite material (PANI/VS2) displayed both the double layer (EDLC) and pseudocapacitance, which overall increases the charge storage capacity (614 F g−1) of the electrode active materials. A similar increasing trend of capacitance was observed for VS2, PANI, and PANI/VS2 as measured from the CD curve as 94, 156, and 822 F g−1, respectively, at a discharge rate of 2 A g−1 (Fig. S2b, ESI†).
The observed higher capacitance for the PANI/VS2 composite material was credited to the higher surface area, supporting that VS2 prevented the aggregation of PANI fibers while PANI micro-fibers avoided restacking the VS2 layers, thus improving the overall electronic conductivity. Considering the superior charge storage capacity of PANI/VS2, detailed electrochemical studies were carried out for the PANI/VS2-based electrodes. Also, the interfacial cavities created by hetero-bonds and van der Waals interactions may provide the interface to store more ions and provide channels for faster ion migration.33 The CV studies of the 3-electrode configuration showed a symmetric and stable behavior even at higher scan rates (Fig. S2c, ESI†). The CV recorded at various scan rates (5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mV s−1) displayed a well-resolved redox peak corresponding to PANI, which revealed that PANI/VS2 has excellent pseudocapacitive behavior with respective discharge capacitance of 614, 500, 424, 349 and 298 F g−1. The observed symmetric anodic and cathodic redox peaks arise from the transformation of PANI from leucoemeraldine to emeraldine and from emeraldine to pernigraniline, further reflecting the superior reversibility of the capacitive material (PANI/VS2). The observed capacitance values were 822, 615, 485, 360, and 300 F g−1 at variable galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) rates of 2, 3, 5, 10, and 20 A g−1 (Fig. S2d, ESI†). The changes in capacitance at higher scan and discharge rates are attributed to the faster mobility and sweeping of the ions, which restricts the complete accessibility of the porous surface.
The detailed electrochemical performance of the PANI/VS2 material was evaluated by employing it in more realistic electrochemical capacitors, i.e., 2-electrode configuration. The two-electrode capacitance under liquid state was measured using a PANI/VS2 coated electrode as the anode and cathode employing 0.5 M H2SO4 as an electrolyte. In a 2-electrode system, the capacitance observed was lower than in a 3-electrode, which is credited to the lack of controlled potential with respect to the reference electrode used in a 3-electrode configuration. Moreover, the indistinguishable redox peaks appeared in the CV measurement (Fig. S2e, ESI†) at different rates (5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mV s−1), also reflected in the observed capacitance values of 132, 118, 106, 82, and 60 F g−1, respectively (Fig. S2f, ESI†).
Quasi-solid-state supercapacitor (QSSC) device fabrication is an effective way to determine the potential of electrode materials in the real device. The QSSC device was fabricated using PVA:H2SO4 as a quasi-solid electrolyte gel and PANI/VS2 as an active electrode material. The recorded CV of the QSSC device showed a symmetric behavior (Fig. 4(a)) with the capacitance values of 102, 86, 76, 50, and 36 F g−1 at different scan rates of 5, 10, 20, 50, and 100 mV s−1, respectively. A similar trend of capacitance is reflected in the capacitance measured from the discharge curve of GCD at galvanostatic rates of 1, 2, 3, and 5 A g−1, as shown in Fig. 4(b). It should be noted that the specific capacitance of the 2-electrode system observed in the liquid electrolyte is close to the capacitance of PANI/VS2 observed in QSSC devices. Therefore, an effective electrode/electrolyte interface establishment in the QSSC devices is demonstrated, as reflected in the measured equivalent series resistance (ESR) observed in EIS analysis (Fig. 4(c)). In addition, the Nyquist plot of the fabricated QSSC device has shown a very small equivalent resistance of <1.6 ohm with a smaller charge transfer resistance (RCT) of <1.4 ohm. The capacitance of the fabricated QSSC device was measured at various charge–discharge rates (1, 2, 3, and 5 A g−1) to understand the ionic mobility and charge storage capacity in the quasi-solid-state device (Fig. 4(d)). A reduction in the capacity from 168 F g−1@1.0 A g−1 to 46 F g−1@5.0 A g−1 was observed. The charge storage capacity reduction at a higher scan rate is due to the faster sweeping of ions during the charge–discharge process as observed in the 3-electrode studies (Fig. S5b, ESI†). The durability of the QSSC device was evaluated to check its robustness under operating conditions. The galvanostatic charge–discharge was carried out for 25000 cycles at 10 A g−1 (Fig. 4(e)). The QSSC device has shown a reduction in capacitance (∼28%) after the initial 7700 cycles and a final reduction to 42% after 25000 cycles with 100% retention in the coulombic efficiency. To investigate the stability of the QSSC, a floating test was carried out at 1 A g−1 with a holding period of 2 h after every consecutive 5 cycles of galvanostatic charge–discharge (Fig. S3, ESI†). An ∼68% retention in the specific capacitance is obtained. The floating test showed a similar trend in the durability of the QSSC device as observed in galvanostatic charge–discharge cycles between predefined upper and lower voltage cut-off limits (performed at 10 A g−1). The post-mortem analysis of the QSSC devices was carried out after the cycling durability. An agglomeration of the active materials is observed in the SEM image (Fig. S4, ESI†). The agglomeration of the active electrode materials is mainly responsible for the degradation in the charge storage capacity of the fabricated devices as reflected in the durability performance studies. The displayed retention in the capacitance and coulombic efficiency of the fabricated QSSC device shows the potential of the PANI/VS2 composite toward electrochemical capacitance application.
In addition, the potential of the fabricated QSSC was tested by demonstrating the lighting of LED. One QSSC device gives 1 V, therefore to light the LED, three devices were connected in series resulting in 3 V being able to light the 3 V LED, as illustrated in Fig. 4(f). The observed capacitance of the fabricated QSSC device showed the potential application of PANI/VS2 toward charge storage.
Furthermore, the zinc-ion battery (ZIB) coin cell testing verified the superior charge storage capacity of the prepared PANI/VS2 composite. The ZIB was fabricated using Zn foil, PANI/VS2, and H+/Zn2+ doped Nafion® as the anode, cathode, and separator/electrolyte membrane, respectively (Experimental section). Fig. 5(a) displays the CV curve of the PANI/VS2 cathode coin cell recorded at scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. The difference in the CV profile of the initial cycle to the later cycles is related to the gradual activation of the electrode and facilitating the mobility of ions at the electrode/electrolyte interfaces and the intercalation/de-intercalation. In the anodic scan, the prominent oxidation peaks at 1.06 V and 1.19 V vs. Zn2+/Zn correspond to the insertion of Zn2+ ions into the cathode.
Similarly, in the cathodic scan, the peaks at 1.07 and 0.88 V are attributed to the gradual extraction of Zn2+ from the PANI/VS2. The employment of an H+ doped Nafion® electrolyte membrane added the advantage of the H+ shuttle mechanism in the charge–discharge process of the ZIB. Instead of traditional Zn2+ ion insertion/extraction, the H+/Zn2+ is known to enhance the performance of ZIBs.34 The redox peaks at 1.07 and 0.88 V vs. Zn2+/Zn correspond to the proton intercalation/extraction, which also facilitates the mobility of Zn2+ ions. However, the mechanisms of H+ ion participation are still not fully understood. The insertion/proton adsorption sites in the cathode are still unknown in the ZIB mechanism. The impedance analysis (Fig. 5(d), blue curve) of the cell after initial CV cycles displayed a small equivalent series resistance (7 ohm) along with a smaller RCT (85 ohm), validating the effective ion transport.
The galvanostatic charge–discharge (GCD) of the coin cell was performed at different charge–discharge rates (0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.50, 1.00, 2.00, and 3.00 A g−1) in the accepted potential window as shown in Fig. 5(b). The peaks in the GCD curve at various voltages correspond to the observed redox peaks in the CV analysis. The GCD profile of the PANI/VS2 cell showed a significantly high discharge capacity of 219 mA h g−1 at a discharge rate of 0.1 A g−1. Notably, the discharge capacity of the cell remains considerably high at increased discharge rates of 1, 2, and 3 A g−1 suggesting the higher cycling potential of the PANI/VS2 composite. The discharge curve obtained in the GCD analysis did not reveal a sharp voltage discharge plateau, which might be due to the porous nature of the PANI/VS2 composite resulting from the prevented stacking and agglomeration of the materials employed. The observed discharge capacity of the PANI/VS2 cell is comparable or even superior to most of the previously reported performance of ZIBs (Table S1, ESI†).
Furthermore, the charge–discharge long-term durability of the PANI/VS2 coin cell was evaluated by cycling at 3.0 A g−1 for 750 cycles (Fig. 5(c)). The GCD cycle of the cell at 3.0 A g−1 showed almost 100% retention in the discharge capacity with an insignificant change in the capacity between the initial (∼80 mA h g−1) and the final GCD cycles (∼79 mA h g−1). The observed small loss in the capacity might be due to the development of resistant layers of Zn(OH)2/ZnO dendrite formation after long cycle durability. The capacity increase in the initial cycles (1–50 cycles) is ascribed to the improved mobility of the ions because of the electrochemical activation of the electrodes. The observed changes in the discharge capacity during the 280–450 cycles is due to variation in temperature during day and night analysis. In addition, the 100% coulombic efficiency retention shows the effective Zn2+ ion insertion/extraction during the cycling process. Additionally, the cycling stability data showed ∼73% capacity compared to the maximum capacity at 0.5 A g−1. The charge storage capacity during the cyclic durability because of dendrite formation is verified by the EIS analysis, as shown in Fig. 5(d). The comparative Nyquist plot of the PANI/VS2 cell before and after the durability test shows an increase in RCT from 85 ohm to 204 ohm. The increased RCT of the cell after durability analysis clearly validates the restricted mobility of ions due to the formation of a high resistance layer, which was further verified by the post-analysis of the electrodes (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6 FESEM analysis of the anode and cathode materials of a coin cell after 750 charge–discharge cycles: (a)–(c) FESEM images of the zinc anode and (d)–(f) FESEM images of the PANI/VS2 cathode. |
The recycling rate capability of the cathode and the capacities of the cell were recorded at various charge–discharge rates in a reversible manner. As shown in Fig. 5(e), the cell showed discharge capacities of 159, 133, 99, 78, and 55 mA h g−1 at current rates of 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 5.0 A g−1, respectively. Furthermore, on decreasing the GCD rate reversibly from 5.0 to 0.5 A g−1, the discharge capacity recovered in the same pattern. However, the slight difference in the discharge capacity is due to the developed resistance, as observed in the EIS analysis (Fig. 5(d)). Notably, the cell showed a 100% retention in coulombic efficiency during charge–discharge cycles at various GCD rates, suggesting the reversible Zn2+ ion insertion/extraction process. Considering the 1.5 V supply from one cell observed in the CV and GCD analysis, the two cells connected in series (3.0 V) were directly used for lighting 36 red LEDs connected in parallel arrangement (Fig. 5(f) and Video S1, ESI†).
The post-durability analysis of the anode and cathode of the ZIB coin cell was carried out by FESEM analysis to verify the structural changes of materials responsible for lowering the durability. Fig. 6 shows the FESEM images of the anode and cathode at various magnifications. The FESEM image of the Zn anode (Fig. 6(a)) before the cycling and (Fig. 6(b) and (c)) after the durability test shows the generation of dendrites on the surface, which also causes the development of passivation layers responsible for increased resistance as observed in the EIS analysis (Fig. 5(d)). In contrast, the FESEM images of the PANI/VS2 cathode (Fig. 6(d)) before and after cycling test (Fig. 6(e) and (f)) display no change in the structural behavior, validating the robustness of the prepared electrode material.
The capacitance of the working electrode was evaluated with the equation:
For CD, the equation is:
The capacity of the Zn//PANI/VS2 is calculated from the galvanostatic charge–discharge plot using the equation:
Capacity = Discharge time (h) × applied current density (A g−1) × 1000. |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ma00070b |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |