Veronica Vida*a,
Martina Minisinib,
Mario Mardirossianc,
Claudio Brancolinib,
Marco Scocchic,
Cristina Forzatoa and
Federico Berti*a
aDipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Farmaceutiche, Università di Trieste, Via Giorgieri 1, 34127, Trieste, Italy. E-mail: veronica.vida@phd.units.it; fberti@units.it
bDipartimento di Area Medica, Università di Udine, Piazzale Kolbe 4, 33100, Udine, Italy
cDipartimento di Scienze della Vita, Università di Trieste, Via Giorgieri 8, 34127, Trieste, Italy
First published on 21st December 2022
Cinnamic acids are an important class of phenolic compounds, which have many beneficial effects on human health but are also interesting synthetic intermediates thanks to the presence of several reactive sites. While studying the reactivity of cinnamic acids with diazonium salts from aromatic amines, an unexpected reactivity has been discovered, leading to the formation of 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes instead of traditional diazo-coupling products. The new compounds have been fully characterized by mono and bidimensional NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry. Preliminary studies on the biological activity of the compounds have been carried out testing both their antibacterial and antitumor activity, leading to promising results.
The chemical properties of DDs are related to the conjugated heterodiene system and to the type of substituents present.3 The characteristic of this heterodiene system is represented by the electrophilic property of C-4, promoted by the electron-withdrawing effect of the azo group, leading the 1,2-diaza-1,3-dienes to be good Michael acceptors through a regioselective nucleophilic attack at the terminal carbon atom in the 4-position.1 Depending on the nucleophile used, which can be either a carbon atom or a hetero atom such as oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, selenium and phosphorus, highly functionalized hydrazones can be formed, which represent the starting point for many reactions involved in the formation of heterocycle systems.1 The presence of substituents on both carbon and nitrogen atoms is another factor that influences both the reactivity and stability of the system.3 In fact, the presence of electron withdrawing groups on one or both of the terminal carbon and nitrogen atoms, improves the stability and enhances the electrophilic character of the diazadienes, favoring the regioselective nucleophilic attack in 4-position but also making them ideal substrates for the “inverse-electron demand” Diels–Alder reaction.1,3 In general, aryl groups favor the stability but not the reactivity, due to the absence of functionalities which are useful for further reactions, whereas alkyl groups or terminal CC bond do not favor stability, leading to collateral reactions.3
Cinnamic acids are a class of compounds with a phenylpropanoid skeleton (C6–C3), which are largely present in the plant kingdom as free compounds or in a conjugated form.4 Coffee beans, cocoa, tea, apples, brassica vegetables, grapes, citrus, pears are particularly rich of cinnamic acids, which are also present as ester conjugates with quinic acid, to give the class of compounds known as chlorogenic acids,4–9 or esters with other acids, sugars or lipids, or forming amides with amino acids (Fig. 1).4,10 They are also precursors of many natural products such as coumarins, lignans, isoflavonoids, flavonoids, stilbenes, aurones, anthocyanins, spermidines, and tannins,4 but they can also be synthesized artificially through the Perkin reaction or a Knoevenagel condensation reaction from aromatic aldehydes.11,12 In the last years, cinnamic acids received a lot of interest due to their biological activities, which include anticancer, antioxidant, antimicrobial, as well as applications in diabetes, tuberculosis, malaria and cardiovascular diseases.4,13 They are also very interesting from the synthetic point of view thanks to the presence of multiple reactive sites, such as the polarized alkenyl moiety and the carboxylic group, being applied in total synthesis of some natural products.13 Several reactions for these compounds have been reported in the literature, such as electrophilic addition, Michael addition and reactivity of the carboxylic acid moiety, but the most important one is probably the decarboxylative formation of C–C and C–heteroatom bonds.13
Due to our interest on different aspects of the chemistry of cinnamic acids, in the attempt of studying the reactivity of diazonium salts from aromatic amines with cinnamic acids, we have observed the unexpected formation of DDs (Scheme 2), thus unveiling a new reaction that could be exploited to develop novel synthetic pathways to these important compounds. The reaction described in the present work for formation of DDs is very advantageous since it takes place under mild reaction conditions, in an aqueous environment, without the need for any catalyst, and with very simple work-up procedures. We report here several examples of reactivity between diazonium salts and different substituted cinnamic acids and a reaction mechanism is proposed. Moreover, as the synthesized DDs have, in our opinion, potential biological activities due to the presence of the activated system which makes them reactive towards nucleophilic groups inside biomolecules, we have also carried out preliminary tests on the activities of the novel compounds on cancer cells and on bacteria.
Integration of the 1H-NMR signals (DMSO-d6) of the obtained product resulted in the assignment of 11 protons instead of the 10 expected in case of a diazo-coupling reaction, which is compatible with the formation of a diazadiene as 3a. The assignments of 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR signals are reported in Tables 1 and 2. For compound 3a, the two doublets at 7.64 ppm and 6.85 ppm (H-10/14 and H-11/13 in Table 1), each integrating for 2 protons with a coupling constant of 8.6 Hz, had the same pattern of the corresponding protons in the starting reagent p-coumaric acid 2a, to demonstrate that the formation of a traditional diazo coupling product was not possible, since in that case there should be the loss of one proton replaced by the nitrogen atom of the diazonium salt, and this would completely change the multiplicity and integration of the signals. A completely different chemical shift was observed for the vinyl protons H-7 and H-8 (Table 1), one at 8.02 ppm and the other under the multiplet at 7.73 ppm, with a coupling constant of 13.7 Hz, whereas the coupling constant between these two protons in the starting cinnamic acid is of 16.0 Hz, and the two protons have chemical shifts of 7.48 ppm and 6.28 ppm. Diazadiene 3a was formed as the only product with a sufficient purity so no further purification was needed.
Position | 3a | 3b | 3c | 5a | 5b | 5c |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 and 5 | 7.73, m | 7.74, m | 7.70, m | 7.64, m | 7.66, m | 7.63, m |
2 and 4 | 7.53, m | 7.53, m | 7.51, m | 7.36, d (8.3) | 7.37, d (8.4) | 7.34, d (8.4) |
3 | 7.47, m | 7.47, m | 7.43, m | — | — | — |
7 | 8.02, d (13.7) | 8.11, d (13.6) | 8.02, d (13.6) | 8.00, d (13.7) | 8.09, d (13.7) | 8.01, d (13.6) |
8 | 7.73, m | 7.70, d (13.6) | 7.67, d (13.6) | 7.64, m | 7.66, m | 7.63, m |
10 | 7.64, d (8.6) | 7.40, d (2.0) | 7.61, d (8.9) | 7.64, m | 7.39, d (2.0) | 7.63, m |
11 | 6.85, d (8.6) | — | 6.76, d (8.9) | 6.84, d (8.7) | 6.76, d (9.0) | |
13 | 6.85, d (8.6) | 6.85, d (8.1) | 6.76, d (8.9) | 6.84, d (8.7) | 6.84, d (8.2) | 6.76, d (9.0) |
14 | 7.64, d (8.6) | 7.22, dd (8.1, 2.0) | 7.61, d (8.9) | 7.64, m | 7.20, dd (8.2, 2.0) | 7.63, m |
OCH3 | — | 3.85, s | — | — | 3.84, s | — |
N(CH3)2 | — | — | 3.00, s | — | — | 3.00, s |
15 | — | — | — | 3.08 and 2.95, dd (13.8, 5.6, 9.3) | 3.09 and 2.95, dd (13.7, 5.6, 9.3) | 3.07 and 2.94, dd (13.8, 5.6, 9.3) |
16 | — | — | — | 4.51, ddd (9.3, 7.8, 5.6) | 4.51, ddd (9.3, 7.8, 5.6) | 4.50, ddd (9.3, 7.8, 5.6) |
18 | — | — | — | 3.61, s | 3.61, s | 3.61, s |
20 | — | — | — | 1.80, s | 1.80, s | 1.80, s |
NH | — | — | — | 8.38, d (7.8) | 8.38, d (7.8) | 8.37, d (7.8) |
Position | Compound | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3a | 3b | 3c | 5a | 5b | 5c | |
1 and 5 | 122.02 | 121.99 | 121.82 | 121.91 | 121.92 | 121.80 |
2 and 4 | 129.39 | 129.35 | 129.28 | 130.04 | 130.07 | 130.05 |
3 | 130.49 | 130.43 | 129.90 | 140.05 | 140.05 | 139.50 |
6 | 152.46 | 152.48 | 152.64 | 151.23 | 151.26 | 151.54 or 151.48 |
7 | 143.94 | 144.29 | 142.59 | 143.94 | 144.30 | 142.66 |
8 | 143.49 | 143.71 | 144.01 | 143.06 | 143.33 | 143.71 |
9 | 125.63 | 126.19 | 122.00 | 125.64 | 126.21 | 122.09 |
10 | 130.31 | 111.09 | 129.97 | 130.22 | 111.04 | 130.00 |
11 | 116.05 | 148.05 | 111.98 | 116.01 | 148.07 | 112.07 |
12 | 159.70 | 149.18 | 151.49 | 159.63 | 149.17 | 151.54 or 151.48 |
13 | 116.05 | 115.79 | 111.98 | 116.01 | 115.80 | 112.07 |
14 | 130.31 | 123.21 | 129.97 | 130.22 | 123.19 | 130.00 |
OCH3 | — | 55.72 | — | — | 55.73 | — |
N(CH3)2 | — | — | 39.5 | — | — | 39.52 |
15 | — | — | — | 36.53 | 36.55 | 36.58 |
16 | — | — | — | 53.37 | 53.39 | 53.49 |
17 | — | — | — | 172.05 | 172.07 | 172.14 |
18 | — | — | — | 51.89 | 51.91 | 51.96 |
19 | — | — | — | 169.37 | 169.40 | 169.55 |
20 | — | — | — | 22.24 | 22.26 | 22.30 |
13C-NMR (Table 2) and bidimensional HSQC and HMBC spectra (see ESI†) were registered to confirm the formation of the DD and fully characterize the new product. In particular, looking at the 13C-NMR spectrum, it is important to highlight the absence of the carboxylic group of the starting reagent p-coumaric acid, and the presence of 10 carbon signals, three of which quaternary. All these data are in line with the hypothesized structure of a DD considering that in case of a diazo-coupling reaction, due to the loss of one proton on the aromatic ring portion of the cinnamic acid, three more carbons should be observed, and there would be two more quaternary carbons. In this way it was possible to confirm that we were in front of a new reaction, never reported in literature before, leading to the formation of DD.
Structure of compound 3a was also confirmed by accurate mass analysis, showing a peak at m/z 225.1023 [M + H]+ (theorical 225.1022) and 247.0843 [M + Na]+ (theorical 247.0842) (see ESI†).
A second reaction was performed using ferulic acid 2b, which differs from 2a by the presence of a methoxy group in ortho position with respect to the OH. In this case the reaction has been tried using two different stoichiometric ratios, 1:2 as in the case of p-coumaric acid, and 1:1. In all the tested conditions, the formation of the corresponding DD 3b has been observed, even if the presence of variable amounts of byproducts has been observed in some cases depending on the experimental conditions, which has made us think that the presence of one further electron donating group might increase the reactivity of the product in side reactions. Different work-up strategies have been evaluated, since it has been observed that in some cases precipitation of the final product did not occur, and extraction with organic solvent was necessary to recover all the product. The best condition resulted to be the 1:2 stoichiometry, extracting the aqueous solution with ethyl acetate, leading to a yield of 98% of the diazadiene 3b, that resulted pure enough to be used without further purification. Also in this case, the formation of diazadiene 3b has been proved through 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR analysis which confirmed retention of the pattern of the original ferulic acid, without the loss of any aromatic proton of the starting cinnamic acid part. Structural assignment was also confirmed by mass spectrometry analysis since two peaks at 255.1120 and 277.0947 m/z were observed corresponding to [M + H]+ and [M + Na]+ ions respectively.
The reaction between aniline 1 with 4-(dimethylamino)cinnamic acid 2c using a 1:1 stoichiometry confirmed this type of reactivity giving compound 3c as the only product with an 81% yield. 1H-NMR, 13C-NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry analyses led to the assignment of the diazadiene structure to compound 3c.
Changing the hydroxycinnamic acid from p-coumaric acid 2a to o-coumaric acid 2d, which has the same electronic effect, the reaction moved towards the formation of the diazo-coupling product 3d. In this case, no precipitate formed, and the reaction mixture was extracted with ethyl acetate, thus obtaining an orange solid, which did not necessitate any further purification. From 1H-NMR analysis, it was possible to identify 10 protons from integration, instead of the 11 in case of formation of the diazadiene. The aromatic part of the cinnamic acid portion presents three signals, each integrating for 1H and the coupling constants observed are in accordance with a substitution at the para position with respect to the OH group of the o-coumaric acid (Scheme 3). The two protons of the double bond do not show relevant changes in the chemical shifts with respect to the starting reagent (as it happens in case of diazadienes) and the coupling constant remains of 16.1 Hz. The formation of diazo-coupling product is also confirmed by the presence of the carboxylic acid carbon at 167.85 ppm in the 13C-NMR spectrum. 2D-NMR as well as mass spectrometry confirm the assigned structure to 3d. From mass spectrometry analysis is possible to find the signal at 269.0 m/z, corresponding to the adduct [M + H]+, and the signal at 291.0 m/z, corresponding to the adduct [M + Na]+. In this reaction, diazo-coupling reaction was likely possible due to a less steric hindrance of the aromatic ring in the activated position.
This option is very different from that of other reactions involving diazonium salts and unsaturated compounds. One previously documented reaction, involving also cinnamic acid, is the Meerwein arylation reaction, originally discovered in 1939 as the copper-catalyzed addition of an aryl-diazonium salt with unsaturated compound, even if an intramolecular version of the reaction, the Pschorr reaction, was firstly reported in 1896.14 The proposed mechanism is radical, and the reaction takes place better when the olephinic double bond is activated by an electron-withdrawing group, such as carbonyl, cyano or aryl.14,15 The result is the addition of the aryl group from the diazonium salt to the carbon atom in β position with respect to the activating group.15 Anyway, this reaction gave low yields, high catalyst loading and formation of side products.14 Nevertheless, other options alternative to reduction of diazonium salts by copper(I) are now available, leading to aryl radicals, thanks to photoredox catalysis, for example, using of [Ru(bpy)3]2+.14 One particular application of the Meerwein reaction involves cinnamic acid: in this case, the reaction leads to the loss of a carbon dioxide molecule and to the formation of the corresponding stilbene.14,15
In the present work we observed a different reactivity with respect to the Meerwein arylation reaction, although the reaction conditions are not the same, and formation of DDs, which has never been reported in the literature, was the only reaction to take place. We could only find a somehow-correlate reaction reported by Xu and colleagues, in which 4,4-dialkylthio-1,2-diaza-1,3-butadienes are synthesized based on the azo-coupling decarboxylation of α-carboxy ketene dithioacetals with aryldiazonium salts.16
In a first screening, cells were incubated with the different compounds at a concentration of 10 μM for 48 hours. 3c was the compound that caused the highest percentage of cell death in SK-UT-1 cells compared with normal HUtSMC (Fig. 2A). The number of Trypan blue-positive cells was approximately 70% in cancer cells and 25% in normal cells. The other compounds were either ineffective (5b) or showed no differential effect between normal and cancer cells (3a, 3b, 5a). 5c, similar to 3c, elicited a differential cell death response in cancer and normal cells, but was less effective than 3c. Therefore, we investigated the death-promoting effect of 3c in more detail. Dose-dependent studies confirmed the specific cell-killing effect of 3c against LMS cells (Fig. 2B).
MIC (μM) | ||
---|---|---|
Compound | S. aureus (ATCC 25923) | E. coli (ATCC 25922) |
3a | 8 | >64 |
3b | 8 | >64 |
3c | >64 | >64 |
5a | 64 | >64 |
5b | 32 | >64 |
5c | >64 | >64 |
The compounds 3a, 3b, 5a and 5b inhibited the growth of S. aureus cells when given at 8 μM (3a, 3b), 32 μM (5b) or at 64 μM (5a), whereas E. coli cells were not susceptible to any of the compounds, at least up to 64 μM. It is worth noting that 3c, which caused the highest percentage of cell death in leiomyosarcoma SK-UT-1 cells, did not affect the viability of either bacterial strain, indicating selective cytotoxicity. In contrast, 3b, which showed anti-Staphylococcus activity, did not affect heavily human cells (regardless their tumoral origin or not) and thus may have selective antibacterial effect. On the other hand, the high insensitivity of E. coli to these compounds is not surprising since Gram-negative bacteria, that possess a second membrane barrier, are generally more resistant to small hydrophobic molecules19 such as DDs.
All the other reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Milano, Italy).
Accurate masses were determined on a micrOTOF-Q (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). Measurements were registered in positive mode.
Infrared spectra were registered on an ATR-IR IRAffinity-1S Fourier transform infrared spectrophotometer (Shimadzu).
Ratio of cinnamic acid/aniline and workup for each product obtained will be described in the specific paragraph.
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.02 (1H, d, J = 13.7 Hz, H-7), 7.73 (3H, m, H-1, H-5, H-8), 7.64 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-10, H-14), 7.53 (2H, m, H-2, H-4), 7.47 (1H, m, H-3), 6.85 (2H, d, J = 8.6 Hz, H-11, H-13). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 159.70 (C-12), 152.46 (C-6), 143.94 (C-7), 143.49 (C-8), 130.49 (C-3), 130.31 (C-10, C-14), 129.39 (C-2, C-4), 125.63 (C-9), 122.02 (C-1, C-5), 116.05 (C-11, C-13). MS (ESI+) 225.1023 [M + H]+ (calculated 225.1022); 247.0843 [M + Na]+ (calculated 247.0842). IR (νmax/cm−1) 1602.85 (stretching NN).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.11 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, H-7), 7.74 (2H, m, H-1, H-5), 7.70 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, H-8), 7.53 (2H, m, H-2, H-4), 7.48 (1H, m, H-3), 7.40 (1H, d, J = 2.0 Hz, H-10), 7.22 (1H, dd, J = 8.1, 2.0 Hz, H-14), 6.85 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, H-13), 3.85 (3H, s, OCH3). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 152.48 (C-6), 149.18 (C-12), 148.05 (C-11), 144.29 (C-7), 143.71 (C-8), 130.43 (C-3), 129.35 (C-2, C-4), 126.19 (C-9), 123.21 (C-14), 121.99 (C-1, C-5), 115.79 (C-13), 111.09 (C-10), 55.72 (OCH3). MS (ESI+): 255.1120 [M + H]+ (calculated 255.1128), 277.0949 [M + Na]+ (calculated 277.0948). IR (νmax/cm−1) 1587.42 (stretching NN).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.02 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, H-7), 7.70 (2H, m, H-1, H-5), 7.67 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, H-8) 7.61 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-10, H-14), 7.51 (2H, m, H-2, H-4), 7.43 (1H, m, H-3), 6.76 (2H, d, J = 8.9 Hz, H-11, H-13), 3.00 (6H, s, N(CH3)2). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 152.64 (C-6), 151.49 (C-12), 144.01 (C-8), 142.59 (C-7), 129.97 (C-10, C-14), 129.90 (C-3), 129.28 (C-2, C-4), 122.00 (C-9), 121.82 (C-1, C-5), 111.98 (C-11, C-13), 39.5 (N(CH3)2). MS (ESI+): 252.1492 [M + H]+ (calculated 252.1495), 274.1310 [M + Na]+ (calculated 274.1315). IR (νmax/cm−1) 1600.92 (stretching NN).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.38 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, NH), 8.00 (1H, d, J = 13.7 Hz, H-7), 7.64 (5H, m, H-1, H-5, H-8, H-10, H-14), 7.36 (2H, d, J = 8.3 Hz, H-2, H-4), 6.84 (2H, d, J = 8.7 Hz, H-11, H-13), 4.51 (1H, ddd, J = 9.3, 7.8, 5.6 Hz, H-16), 3.61 (3H, s, H-18), 3.08 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 5.6 Hz, H-15), 2.95 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 9.3 Hz, H-15), 1.80 (3H, s, H-20). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.05 (C-17), 169.37 (C-19), 159.63 (C-12), 151.23 (C-6), 143.94 (C-7), 143.06 (C-8), 140.05 (C-3), 130.22 (C-10, C-14), 130.04 (C-2, C-4), 125.64 (C-9), 121.91 (C-1, C-5), 116.01 (C-11, C-13), 53.37 (C-16), 51.89 (C-18), 36.53 (C-15), 22.24 (C-20). MS (ESI+): 368.1595 [M + H]+ (calculated 368.1605), 390.1417 [M + Na]+ (calculated 390.1424). IR (νmax/cm−1) 1602.85 (stretching NN).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.38 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, NH), 8.09 (1H, d, J = 13.7 Hz, H-7), 7.66 (3H, m, H-1, H-5, H-8), 7.37 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2, H-4), 7.39 (1H, d, J = 2 Hz, H-10), 7.20 (1H, dd, J = 8.2, 2.0 Hz, H-14), 6.84 (1H, d, J = 8.2 Hz, H-13), 4.51 (1H, ddd, J = 9.3, 7.8, 5.6, H-16), 3.84 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.61 (3H, s, H-18), 3.09 (1H, dd, J = 13.7, 5.6 Hz, H-15), 2.95 (1H, dd, J = 13.7, 9.3 Hz, H-15), 1.80 (3H, s, H-20). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.07 (C-17), 169.40 (C-19), 151.26 (C-6), 149.17 (C-12), 148.07 (C-11), 144.30 (C-7), 143.33 (C-8), 140.05 (C-3), 130.07 (C-2, C-4), 126.21 (C-9), 123.19 (C-14), 121.92 (C-1, C-5), 115.80 (C-13), 111.04 (C-10), 55.73 (OCH3), 53.39 (C-16), 51.91 (C-18), 36.55 (C-15), 22.26 (C-20). MS (ESI+): 398.1704 [M + H]+ (calculated 398.1710), 420.1528 [M + Na]+ (calculated 420.1530). IR (νmax/cm−1) 1598.99 (stretching NN).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.37 (1H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, NH), 8.01 (1H, d, J = 13.6 Hz, H-7), 7.63 (5H, m, H-1, H-5, H-8, H-10, H-14), 7.34 (2H, d, J = 8.4 Hz, H-2, H-4), 6.76 (2H, d, J = 9.0 Hz, H-11, H-13), 4.50 (1H, ddd, J = 9.3, 7.8, 5.6 Hz, H-16), 3.61 (3H, s, H-18), 3.07 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 5.6 Hz, H-15), 3.00 (6H, s, N(CH3)2), 2.94 (1H, dd, J = 13.8, 9.3 Hz, H-15), 1.80 (3H, s, H-20). 13C NMR (126 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 172.14 (C-17), 169.55 (C-19), 151.54 (C-6 or C-12), 151.48 (C-6 or C-12), 143.71 (C-8), 142.66 (C-7), 139.50 (C-3), 130.05 (C-2, C-4), 130.00 (C-10, C-14), 122.09 (C-9), 121.80 (C-1, C-5), 112.07 (C-11, C-13), 53.49 (C-16), 51.96 (C-18), 39.52 (N(CH3)2), 36.58 (C-15), 22.30 (C-20). MS (ESI+): 395.2076 [M + H]+ (calculated 395.2078), 417.1905 [M + Na]+ (calculated 417.1897). IR (νmax/cm−1) 1598.99 (stretching NN).
1H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 8.16 (1H, d, J = 2.4 Hz, H-12), 7.85 (4H, m, H-1, H-5, H-8, H-13), 7.58 (2H, m, H-2, H-4), 7.52 (1H, m, H-3), 7.10 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-9), 6.66 (1H, d, J = 16.1 Hz, H-14). 13C NMR (101 MHz, DMSO-d6) δ 167.85 (C-15), 159.74 (C-10), 152.00 (C-6), 145.15 (C-7), 138.68 (C-13), 130.80 (C-3), 129.38 (C-2, C-4), 124.84 (C-12), 124.70 (C-8), 122.25 (C-1, C-5), 121.53 (C-11), 119.87 (C-14), 116.94 (C-9). MS (ESI+): 269.0 [M + H]+, 291.0 [M + Na]+.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Mono- and bidimensional NMR spectra and mass spectra of all the newly synthesized compounds. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra07515f |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |