Qiang Zhang*,
Xiao Zou,
Ningqi Zhang and
Bo Liu
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Catalysis, School of Chemistry and Environmental Science, Shaanxi University of Technology, Han zhong, 723001, P. R. China. E-mail: zhangqiang22@126.com
First published on 10th March 2023
A novel cobalt-catalyzed protocol for the synthesis of carbinol derivatives and benzil derivatives has been developed. In the presence of CoI2 as the catalyst and tmphen (3,4,7,8-tetramethyl-1,10-phenanthroline) as the ligand, the corresponding arylated products were obtained from the addition of aryltrimethylgermanes to aromatic aldehydes and arylglyoxals in moderate to excellent yields under air atmosphere.
The reaction of PhGeMe3 (1a) and 4-nitrobenzaldehyde (2a) was firstly chosen as the model reaction for this cobalt-catalyst system (Fig. 1).
Ligands were firstly screened since it often plays an important role in transition-metal-catalyzed chemistry.9 The effects of phosphine ligand with different electron-donating, electron-withdrawing and steric hindrance groups were examined (Fig. 1, L1–L4), but no target product was detected. However, the yield of 3a could be improved to 80% when the combination of CoCl2 and tmphen (L8) was employed (Fig. 1, L8). Subsequently, various reaction conditions concerning the types and amount of cobalt sources, the effects of time and temperature, bases, solvents, were examined to increase the yield of product (Table 1). After extensive screening, the optimized reaction condition was established as follows: CoI2 (2.5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 2.5 mol%), K2CO3 (1.0 mmol), THF (3.0 mL), ArGeMe3 (0.65 mmol) and aldehydes (0.5 mmol), 65 °C, 12 h. Among the bases we used, K2CO3 was superior to other bases such as NaHCO3, Na2CO3, NaOAc, KF, Li2CO3, and Cs2CO3. 14% yield of benzophenone was detected when using Cs2CO3 as the base under model reaction condition (Table 1, entry 7). The choice of solvents was also crucial to the reaction. THF was proved to be the best one of all the solvents we chosed.
Entry | Catalyst | Base | Solvent | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: 1 (126 mg, 0.65 mmol), 2 (76 mg, 0.5 mmol), cobalt source (5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 5.9 mg, 5 mol%); base (1.0 mmol), solvent (3 mL), 65 °C for 12 h, under air in reaction tubes.b Yields of isolated products after chromatography.c CoI2 (3.9 mg, 2.5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 3.0 mg, 2.5 mol%).d CoI2 (15.6 mg, 10 mol%), tmphen (L8, 11.8 mg, 10 mol%). | ||||
1 | — | — | THF | N.R |
2 | CoCl2 | — | THF | N.R |
3 | CoCl2 | NaHCO3 | THF | 21 |
4 | CoCl2 | Na2CO3 | THF | 51 |
5 | CoCl2 | NaOAc | THF | 28 |
6 | CoCl2 | KF | THF | 53 |
7 | CoCl2 | Cs2CO3 | THF | 71 |
8 | CoCl2 | K2CO3 | THF | 80 |
9 | CoCl2 | K2CO3 | DME | 62 |
10 | CoCl2 | K2CO3 | CH3CN | <5 |
11 | CoCl2 | K2CO3 | DMF | <5 |
12 | CoCl2 | K2CO3 | Dioxane | 37 |
13c | CoI2 | K2CO3 | THF | 92 |
14d | CoI2 | K2CO3 | THF | 90 |
15 | CoI2 | K2CO3 | THF | 87 |
16 | CoBr2 | K2CO3 | THF | 67 |
17 | Co(OAc)2 | K2CO3 | THF | 58 |
18 | Co(C5H5)2 | K2CO3 | THF | 14 |
19 | Co3O4 | K2CO3 | THF | <5 |
20 | PdCl2 | K2CO3 | THF | <5 |
21 | RhCl3·3H2O | K2CO3 | THF | <5 |
Subsequently, various reaction conditions concerning the types and amounts of cobalt sources, the effects of time and temperature, bases, solvents, were examined to increase the yield (Table 1). After extensive screening, the optimized reaction condition was established as follows: CoI2 (2.5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 2.5 mol%), K2CO3 (1.0 mmol), THF (3.0 mL), ArGeMe3 (0.65 mmol) and aldehydes (0.5 mmol), 65 °C, 12 h. Among the bases we used, K2CO3 was superior to other bases such as NaHCO3, Na2CO3, NaOAc, KF, Li2CO3, and Cs2CO3. 14% yield of benzophenone was detected when using Cs2CO3 as the base under model reaction condition (Table 1, entry 7). The choice of solvents was also crucial to the reaction. THF was proved to be the best one of all the solvents we chosed.
With the optimized conditions in hand, a variety of aldehydes with electron-rich, electron-deficient and steric hindrance was examined to broaden the extent of the reaction. Typical functional groups such as methyl, methoxyl, fiuoro, chloro were well tolerated under the reaction conditions. Electron-deficient analogues of aldehyde reacted with ArGeMe3 easily and gave biarylmethanols in good yields (Table 2, entries 1–10). Particularly, 4-formylbenzaldehyde could react with PhGeMe3 and the product of 3n and keep one formyl group untouched (Table 2, entry 14). The chloro and bromo groups untouched in this catalytic system (Table 2, entries 9 and 10). Unfortunately, the reaction was stopped by using aldehydes with neutral and electron-rich groups or aliphatic aldehydes due to its low activity to aryltrimethylgermane under this reaction condition. However, butyraldehyde or 4-methoxybenzaldehyde as substrate react with phenyltrimethylgermane did not give the responding products. Similarly, tetramethylgermane as substrate react with 4-nitro-phenyladehyde also did not give the responding products.
Entry | Product | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: ArGeMe3 1 (0.65 mmol), aldehyde 2 (0.5 mmol), CoI2 (3.9 mg, 2.5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 3.0 mg, 2.5 mol%), K2CO3 (138 mg, 1.0 mmol), THF (3 mL), 65 °C for 12 h, under air in pressure tubes.b Yields of isolated products after chromatography. | ||
1 | 92 | |
2 | 94 | |
3 | 93 | |
4 | 93 | |
5 | 91 | |
6 | 92 | |
7 | 93 | |
8 | 95 | |
9 | 92 | |
10 | 91 | |
11 | 85 | |
12 | 76 | |
13 | 87 | |
14 | 93 | |
15 | 55 | |
16 | 91 |
During broadening the extent of the reaction, the phenylglyoxal hydrate was examined to broaden the scope of the reaction, which could be seen as the electron-deficient analogue instead of 4-nitrobenzaldehyde. Only a trace of benzoin formed, the benzil was instead the major final product. Obviously, benzil was resulted from catalytic oxidation of in situ generated benzoin in the presence of K2CO3 in air. It was noteworthy that the over oxidation product could not be detected under argon atmosphere with degassed THF. A more efficient catalytic system with the dual ability to facilitate the addition of ArGeMe3 to phenylglyoxal hydrate was obtained when K2CO3 was exchange by Cs2CO3 as the base. Then, the optimized reaction conditions were then extended to conversions of PhGeMe3 to phenylglyoxal hydrate as follows: CoI2 (3.9 mg, 2.5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 3.0 mg, 2.5 mol%), Cs2CO3 (326 mg, 1.0 mmol), THF (3.0 mL), PhGeMe3(0.65 mmol) and phenylglyoxal hydrate (0.5 mmol), 65 °C, 12 h (Table 3).
Entry | Product | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: ArGeMe3 (0.65 mmol), arylglyoxal (0.5 mmol), CoI2 (3.9 mg, 2.5 mol%), tmphen (L8, 3.0 mg, 2.5 mol%), Cs2CO3 (138 mg, 1.0 mmol), THF (3 mL), 65 °C for 12 h, under air in pressure tubes.b Yields of isolated products after chromatography. | ||
1 | 95 | |
2 | 94 | |
3 | 93 | |
4 | 92 | |
5 | 91 | |
6 | 93 | |
7 | 92 | |
8 | 67 | |
9 | 59 | |
10 | 78 | |
11 | 87 | |
12 | 91 | |
13 | 92 | |
14 | 94 | |
15 | 93 |
The reactions of different ArGeMe3 with arylglyoxals were examined to broaden the scope of the reaction. All the reactions catalyzed by CoI2/tmphen proceeded well and provided the desired products in good yields. Although the hetero-atoms in the heteroaryltrimethylgermanes might coordinate to transition-metal, trimethyl(thiophen-3-yl)germane and trimethyl(thiophen-2-yl)germane were still good partners for the addition reaction. The corresponding products were isolated in 67% and 59% yields, respectively (Table 3, entries 11 and 12). It seemed that the ortho substituents had little influence on their activities. For instance, (2-chlorophenyl)trimethylgermane, trimethyl(o-tolyl)germane and trimethyl(naphthalen-1-yl)germane could react with phenylglyoxal hydrate to furnish 4j, 4k, and 4l in excellent yields (Table 3, entries 13–15). The comparison of PhGeMe3 and its congener PhSiMe3 was also investigated under the optimised reaction conditions. However, PhSiMe3 was not the proper candidates and recovered the reactants. Similarly, tetramethylgermane as substrate to react phenylglyoxal hydrate did not give the responding products.
To further understand the mechanism, the model reaction under optimized reaction conditions was studied by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. The data showed that 1,1′-biphenyl and hexamethyldigermane were the by-products, except for the addition product and the reactants. To account for the present reaction, a plausible mechanism based upon the above experimental results was proposed as follows (Fig. 2).
A plausible mechanism for forming diarylmethanols (Fig. 2): the catalytic cycle may contain three steps: Co(II) undergoes transmetallation to form ArCo(II)IL (A), which exhibits high nucleophilicity toward carbonyl carbon might produce the byproduct with 1,1′-diphenyl and hexamethyldigermane through cross-coupling reaction. Then arylcobalt11 should be transferred to carbonyl carbon through the insertion gives the intermediate (B). Finally, the hydrolysis of intermediate (B) affords the diarylmethanols. Cs2CO3 might facilitate the addition of aryltrimethylgermane to arylglyoxal and prompt the aerobic oxidation of the carbinol; The ICo–OH species reacts with I− to regenerate the active CoI2 for the next cycle.
In summary, we describe here the first time a mild cobalt-catalyzed nucleophilic arylation of aromatic aldehydes and arylglyoxals with ArGeMe3 using CoI2/tmphen catalytic system. In the presence of CoI2/tmphen catalytic system, a variety of electron-deficient arylaldehydes and arylglyoxals was found to be suitable substrates for the reaction with ArGeMe3 in moderate to excellent yields. It was noteworthy that our methodology could keep the formyl group chloro and bromo groups untouched for further functionalization. This method might provide potential opportunities for the addition of ArGeMe3 to unsaturated carbon–carbon bonds and unsaturated carbon-hetero bonds. The detailed mechanism of the reaction and further applications of ArGeMe3 are the focus of ongoing efforts in our laboratory.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra00836c |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |