Correction: C–H activation and subsequent C–C bond formation in rigid alkenes catalyzed by Ru(III) metallates

Abstract

Correction for ‘C–H activation and subsequent C–C bond formation in rigid alkenes catalyzed by Ru(III) metallates’ by S. Dharani et al., React. Chem. Eng., 2023, 8, 164–174, https://doi.org/10.1039/D2RE00317A.

---

The authors regret that several incorrect values were input into Tables 1 and 2 in the original manuscript. The corrected Tables 1 and 2 are as shown below.

Table 1 Crystallographic data of the ligand HL² and complexes RuL¹ and RuL²

	HL^2	RuL^1	RuL^2
Empirical formula	C14H17N3O2S	C23H28N3O6RuS	C24H30N3O6RuS
Formula weight	291.36	575.61	589.64
Temperature	100(2) K	100(2) K	100(2) K
Wavelength	0.7107 Å	1.5418 Å	1.5418 Å
Crystal system	Orthorhombic	Triclinic	Triclinic
Space group	Pbca	P1̄	P1̄
Unit cell dimensions
a	13.021(2) Å	9.247(4) Å	8.641(2) Å
b	10.688(2) Å	11.966(4) Å	12.432(5) Å
c	20.554(3) Å	11.968(5) Å	13.006(7) Å
α	90°	63.486(4)°	63.222(5)°
β	90°	87.750(3)°	82.336(3)°
γ	90°	86.958(3)°	86.701(3)°
Volume	2860.5(8) Å^3	1183.2(9) Å^3	1236.3(10) Å^3
Z	8	2	2
Density	1.353 Mg m^−3	1.616 Mg m^−3	1.584 Mg m^−3
Absorption coefficient	0.231 mm^−1	6.575 mm^−1	6.307 mm^−1
F(000)	1232	590	606
θ range for data collection	2.525 to 28.351°	4.094 to 72.914°	3.963 to 73.132°
Limiting indices	−17 ≤ h ≤ 17, −13 ≤ k ≤ 14, −27 ≤ l ≤ 27	−11 ≤ h ≤9, −14 ≤ k ≤ 14, −14 ≤ l ≤ 14	−10 ≤ h ≤ 10, −12 ≤ k ≤ 15, −16 ≤ l ≤ 16
Reflections collected	50 114	13 457	14 034
Independent reflections	3579 [R(int) = 0.0759]	4639 [R(int) = 0.0224]	4852 [R(int) = 0.0290]
Absorption correction	Semi-empirical from equivalents	Gaussian and multi scan	Gaussian and multi scan
Refinement method	Full-matrix least-squares on F^2	Full-matrix least-squares on F^2	Full-matrix least-squares on F^2
Data/restraints/parameters	3579/49/215	4639/0/317	4852/0/326
Goodness-of-fit on F^2	1.044	1.038	1.037
Final R indices [I > 2σ(I)]	R 1 = 0.0529, wR2 = 0.1417	R 1 = 0.0266, wR2 = 0.0687	R 1 = 0.0227, wR2 = 0.0578
R indices (all data)	R 1 = 0.0819, wR2 = 0.1269	R 1 = 0.0273, wR2 = 0.0693	R 1 = 0.0243, wR2 = 0.0590

---

Table 2 Selected bond lengths (Å) and bond angles (°) of the ligand HL² and the Ru(III) complexes RuL¹ and RuL²

Bond lengths	HL^2	RuL^1	RuL^2
O(1)–C(1)	1.258(03)	—	—
N(1)–C(1)	1.405(03)	—	—
N(1)–N(2)	1.369(03)	1.406(03)	1.405(02)
S(1)–C(4)	1.654(03)	—	—
N(3)–C(4)	1.488(07)	—	—
Ru(1)–N(1)	—	2.011(18)	2.000(15)
Ru(1)–S(1)	—	2.329(06)	2.337(05)
Ru(1)–O(3)	—	2.012(15)	2.023(13)
Ru(1)–O(4)	—	2.065(15)	2.018(13)
Ru(1)–O(5)	—	2.022(15)	2.061(13)
Ru(1)–O(6)	—	2.025(16)	2.016(13)
Bond angles
N(1)–Ru(1)–S(1)	—	84.61(5)	83.32(4)
S(1)–Ru(1)–O(3)	—	89.81(5)	93.31(4)
O(3)–Ru(1)–O(6)	—	88.37(6)	179.05(5)
O(6)–Ru(1)–O(4)	—	86.82(7)	88.26(5)
O(4)–Ru(1)–O(5)	—	87.65(6)	86.43(5)
O(5)–Ru(1)–N(1)	—	89.86(7)	98.06(6)
O(3)–Ru(1)–O(4)	—	91.98(6)	90.87(5)
O(5)–Ru(1)–S(1)	—	90.52(5)	178.55(4)
O(5)–Ru(1)–O(6)	—	90.29(6)	93.34(5)
O(6)–Ru(1)–S(1)	—	91.06(5)	87.12(4)
N(1)–Ru(1)–O(3)	—	91.51(7)	90.75(6)
N(1)–Ru(1)–O(4)	—	97.51(7)	175.32(5)
N(1)–Ru(1)–O(6)	—	175.67(7)	90.14(6)
S(1)–Ru(1)–O(4)	—	177.19(4)	92.21(4)
O(3)–Ru(1)–O(5)	—	178.62(6)	86.22(5)

---

The Royal Society of Chemistry apologizes for these errors and any consequent inconvenience to authors and readers.

---