Hesham M. H.
Zakaly
*ab,
H.
Hashim
c,
Shams A. M.
Issa
bd,
Moustafa A.
Darwish
*c,
Fatma M.
Obiedallah
e,
M. S. I.
Koubisy
a and
H. A.
Saudi
f
aFaculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Assiut Branch, Assiut 71524, Egypt. E-mail: h.m.zakaly@gmail.com
bInstitute of Physics and Technology, Ural Federal University, Yekaterinburg 620002, Russia
cPhysics Department, Faculty of Science, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt. E-mail: mostafa_ph@science.tanta.edu.eg
dPhysics Department, Faculty of Science, University of Tabuk, Tabuk 71451, Saudi Arabia
ePhysics Department, Faculty of Science, Assiut University, Assiut 71516, Egypt
fPhysics Department, Faculty of Science (Girls Branch), Al-Azhar University, Egypt
First published on 18th October 2024
Retraction of ‘Eco-friendly repurposing of by-pass waste for optics and radiation protection: addressing hazardous material challenges’ by Hesham M. H. Zakaly et al., Mater. Adv., 2024, https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ma01062g.
During the proofing stage, the authors identified substantial inaccuracies in the bandgap values reported in Table 1, as well as related figures and equations. These inaccuracies were traced back to a calibration error in the UV-visible spectroscopy equipment, which necessitated a comprehensive revision of the data and subsequent recalculations.
Given the extent of the necessary corrections, which included changes to key figures and equations, the editorial team and authors determined that the most appropriate course of action was retraction and republication of the article with revised data.
The Royal Society of Chemistry is happy that republication of the work with the relevant data and conclusions is appropriate, with the article having undergone a full peer review process. The republished article can now be found at https://doi.org/10.1039/D4MA00519H.
The authors would like to express their commitment to maintaining the highest standards of scientific integrity. The errors were unintentional, and the authors took immediate steps to rectify them as soon as they were identified.
We would also like to clarify that the original manuscript contained an erroneous refractive index value in Fig. 5, with values incorrectly reported as being below 1. This mistake occurred due to a calibration error in the UV-visible spectroscopy equipment, which led to an incorrect calculation of the refractive index. The error has been thoroughly corrected in the revised manuscript, ensuring that the data now accurately reflects the material properties and adheres to established physical laws.
The authors sincerely apologize for any confusion caused by these errors and are grateful to the journal for their assistance in ensuring that the scientific record is accurate and reliable.
Signed: Hesham M. H. Zakaly, H. Hashim, Shams A. M. Issa, Moustafa A. Darwish, Fatma M. Obiedallah, M. S. I. Koubisy and H. A. Saudi
Date: 10th September 2024
Retraction endorsed by Jeremy Allen, Executive Editor, Materials Advances
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024 |