Open Access Article
This Open Access Article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 3.0 Unported Licence

Superionic conduction in a Mg2+-containing covalent organic framework at intermediate temperature

Akinori Mohri , Yuki Oami and Masaaki Sadakiyo *
Department of Applied Chemistry, Faculty of Science Division I, Tokyo University of Science, 1-3 Kagurazaka, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 162-8601, Japan. E-mail: sadakiyo@rs.tus.ac.jp

Received 27th June 2024 , Accepted 25th July 2024

First published on 5th August 2024


Abstract

We report superionic conduction in a Mg2+-containing covalent organic framework (COF) at intermediate temperature in the absence of guest vapors. A COF containing Mg2+ carriers and polyethylene oxide (PEO) chains in its channels (TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg) was synthesized. TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg showed superionic conductivity above 10−4 S cm−1 under dry N2 at 160 °C.


Magnesium ion (Mg2+) conduction in solids is a current topic in materials chemistry because of its potential application as an electrolyte in rare-element-free secondary batteries.1 However, it is known that the divalency of Mg2+ prevents its migration in solids because of the strong electrostatic interaction with neighboring anions.2 So far, to enhance the ionic conductivity of Mg2+, two approaches have been mainly studied in traditional solids having closely-packed structures. One is to reduce the electrostatic interaction by increasing the ionic radius of the neighboring anions by employing S2− or Se2− instead of O2−, which led to superionic conductivity of around 10−4 S cm−1 (i.e., MgSc2Se4) at ambient temperature (25 °C).3 Another is to elevate the operating temperature by employing thermally stable materials, which led to superionic conductivity above 10−4 S cm−1 (e.g., MgZr4(PO4)6) at high temperature (>500 °C).2,4 However, there is a lack of an effective approach to realize such superionic conductivity (>10−4 S cm−1) of Mg2+-containing materials in the temperature region between them, which is sometimes called the intermediate temperature region (e.g., 100–300 °C).5

Recently, crystalline porous solids such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and covalent organic frameworks (COFs) have emerged as a new class of ionic conductors.6 Regarding Mg2+ conduction, we recently reported that Mg2+-containing MOFs show superionic conductivity above 10−4 S cm−1 at low temperature (25 °C) in the presence of vapors of small guest molecules such as MeCN.7–9 We found that the adsorbed guest molecules in the MOF's pores accelerate the migration of Mg2+ through the formation of coordinated Mg2+ carriers, which would reduce the electrostatic interaction with neighboring species.8 However, one of the problems is that the high ionic conductivity is only present in the presence of guest vapors, and thus the operating temperature is limited at least below boiling points of small guest molecules (e.g., ≲82 °C for MeCN). On the other hand, some COFs including polyethylene oxide (PEO) chains in their channels have recently been reported as guest-molecule-free ionic conductors operating in the intermediate temperature region.10–12 However, all the cases dealt with Li+ conduction which is enhanced by segmental motion of the included PEO chains and there is no report of Mg2+-conducting COFs.

Here, we report on superionic conduction in a Mg2+-containing COF in the absence of guest vapors. According to the case of Li+-conducting COFs,10–12 we employed long PEO chains (PEO-9, Fig. 1) to achieve high ionic conductivity in the intermediate temperature region without the presence of small guest molecules. The long PEO chains were introduced in the channels of a COF (TPB-PEO-9-COF) to help the migration of the included Mg2+ through their segmental motion. The COF containing long PEO chains and Mg2+ carriers (TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg) was synthesized by introduction of Mg(TFSI)2 (TFSI = bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) after the imination reaction with 1,3,5-tri(4-aminophenyl)benzene (TPB) and 2,5-bis(nonaethylene glycol)oxy-1,4-dibenzaldehyde (PEO-9) (Fig. 1). TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg showed superionic conductivity of 1.8 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 160 °C under dry N2, i.e., the absence of guest vapors, which is the highest value among Mg2+-containing crystalline compounds in the intermediate temperature region. Transport number of Mg2+ (tMg2+) was also estimated to be 0.31 and thus we could state that this is the first demonstration of a COF-based Mg2+ conductor.


image file: d4dt01424c-f1.tif
Fig. 1 Schematic illustration of the synthesis of TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg.

TPB-PEO-9-COF (without Mg2+) was synthesized according to previous reports (details are shown in the ESI).10,11 TPB-PEO-9-COF was prepared by heating a mixture of TPB, PEO-9, 1,4-dioxane, mesitylene, and aqueous solution of acetic acid to form imino groups through dehydration between TPB and PEO-9. The prepared COF was characterized using X-ray powder diffraction (XRPD), infrared (IR) spectra, and elemental analysis. In the XRPD pattern (Fig. 2), the sharp peaks at around 2.76°, 5.56°, 7.40°, and 9.74° correspond to (100), (200), (210) and (220) facets, respectively,10 which indicates the successful formation of the TPB-based crystalline COF.10 The broadened peak at around ∼21° is attributable to the (001) facet; the significant broadening of the 001 peak is similar to that of the previously reported COF containing long PEO chains.11 The good agreement between the elemental analysis (see the ESI) and the presence of the peaks at around 2930 cm−1 (CH stretching vibration mode of the alkyl groups on the PEO chains) in the IR spectra (Fig. S1) also indicated the successful synthesis of the COF. TPB-PEO-9-COF showed almost no adsorption of N2 at 77 K (Fig. S2). Note that, as described later, we also prepared TPB-PEO-3-COF by employing PEO-3 (2,5-bis(triethylene glycol)oxy-1,4-dibenzaldehyde) and it also showed almost no adsorption of N2. Considering the fact that the same framework with no PEO chain shows apparent porosity,10 the results indicate the presence of the PEO chains in the COF channels.


image file: d4dt01424c-f2.tif
Fig. 2 XRPD patterns of (blue) TPB-PEO-9-COF, (red) TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg, and (green) TPB-PEO-9-COF-recovered.

The Mg2+ carrier, Mg(TFSI)2, was introduced by immersing the prepared COF in tetrahydrofuran (THF) solution of Mg(TFSI)2, followed by washing with THF solvent to clean up the surface of the crystallites (see the ESI). The amount of Mg2+ carriers in TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg was 2.1 per formula (i.e., {C6H3(C6H4N)3}2{C6H2(C38H78O20)(CH)2}3{Mg(TFSI)2}2.1 (after dehydration)), determined by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). The incorporation of a certain amount of Mg2+ salt clearly indicates that TPB-PEO-9-COF has apparent capacity to include additional components, while it did not show N2 adsorption. It should be noted that we also tried to prepare a similar COF sample including Mg2+ with shorter PEO chains by employing PEO-3, i.e., TPB-PEO-3-COF. However, TPB-PEO-3-COF did not include an apparent amount of Mg2+ carriers through this method. This is indicative that the long PEO chain in TPB-PEO-9-COF is critically important to accommodate the Mg salt in its channels, which would be because of the coordination ability of the PEO chain to Mg2+. IR spectra of the Mg2+-containing sample (Fig. 3) also confirmed the presence of the PEO chains (e.g., CH stretching mode at around 2930 cm−1) and the Mg(TFSI)2 salt (e.g., SO stretching (at around 1350 cm−1) and CF stretching (at around 1200 cm−1) modes). The XRPD pattern of TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg (Fig. 2) indicated apparently lower intensity of the main peaks, such as 100 (2.76°), 200 (5.56°), and 210 (7.40°), than those of TPB-PEO-9-COF, while the broadened 001 peak (at around ∼21°) remains. There are some possibilities for this change. One is the collapse of the framework. The other is the change in electron density in the inner channels or weakening of the long-range order of the framework. To clear this point, we measured the XRPD pattern of the Mg2+-desorbed sample (TPB-PEO-9-COF-recovered), prepared by immersing TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg in THF solution of 18-crown-6-ether at RT overnight to desorb the included Mg2+ salt. As shown in Fig. 2, the peaks are recovered after desorption of Mg2+, confirming that the weakening of the main peaks of the Mg2+-containing COF (TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg) was not derived from the collapse of the framework and that the framework structure of the Mg2+-containing sample still remains even after the Mg2+ incorporation.


image file: d4dt01424c-f3.tif
Fig. 3 IR spectra of TPB-PEO-9-COF, Mg(TFSI)2 (more accurately described as Mg(TFSI)2·8H2O under air), and TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg.

To clarify the thermal behaviour of the samples, we performed thermogravimetry (TG) analysis and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). As shown in Fig. S3, the TG curves indicated that TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg and TPB-PEO-9-COF are thermally stable below 250 °C and that some water molecules were adsorbed in the sample under air, which is consistent with the results of IR measurements (i.e., presence of broad peaks at around 3200–3600 cm−1). Fig. S4 shows the DSC profiles of TPB-PEO-9-COF and TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg. As shown in Fig. S4, these samples exhibited endothermic glass transition at around −59 °C (for TPB-PEO-9-COF) and −14 °C (for TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg), which is similar to the case of the COFs with long PEO chains.11 The difference in thermal behaviour between these samples indicated the successful incorporation of the Mg salt in the COF channels. The result also confirmed the presence of dynamic segmental motion of the PEO chains in TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg in the temperature region above the transition, which would be critically important for efficient migration of the included ionic carriers.

To clarify the ion-conductive property of the Mg2+-containing COF under the guest-vapor-free conditions, we performed alternating current (ac) impedance measurements under dry N2 (Fig. S5). The sample was dehydrated at 130 °C (under N2 overnight) before the measurement to prevent the effect of proton conduction derived from the included water molecules under air. Fig. 4 shows the temperature dependence of the ionic conductivity of TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg. The conductivity monotonically increased with increasing the temperature in the range from 30 to 160 °C, i.e., Arrhenius-type behavior in ionic conduction. While the ionic conductivity of TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg at ambient temperature is moderate (∼10−7 S cm−1), it gradually increases with temperature and finally reached a superionic conductivity of 1.8 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 160 °C. By comparing the conductivity of TPB-PEO-9-COF (i.e., without Mg(TFSI)2) and bulk Mg(TFSI)2 (Fig. S6), it is clear that this superionic conductivity is derived from the migration of Mg(TFSI)2 carriers incorporated inside the COF and is not derived from some of the impurities such as bulk Mg(TFSI)2 located outside the COF crystals. As described before, a superionic conductivity above 10−4 S cm−1 in the intermediate temperature region has not been achieved yet in Mg2+-containing crystalline materials (Fig. S7), while some superionic conductors operating in different temperature regions were reported (e.g., (Mg0.1Hf0.9)4/3.8Nb(PO4)3 (>10−4 S cm−1 at 600 °C),13 MgSc2Se4 (∼10−4 S cm−1 at 25 °C),3 and MIL-101⊃{Mg(TFSI)2}1.6(MeCN)n (1.9 × 10−3 S cm−1 at 25 °C)8). Therefore, this value (i.e., 1.8 × 10−4 S cm−1) is the highest in this temperature region. Since the migration of Mg2+ in TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg cannot be demonstrated only by the ac impedance measurements because it includes both cations and anions as the ionic carriers, we measured transport number of Mg2+ through dc polarization of the cell composed of non-blocking electrodes (see the ESI). As shown in Fig. S8, steady current was successfully observed at 160 °C and the transport number of Mg2+ was estimated to be tMg2+ = 0.31, confirming the Mg2+ transport in the sample. Therefore, we could also state that this is the first demonstration of Mg2+ conduction in COFs. The activation energy at around the optimal temperature (120–160 °C) was estimated to be 0.32 eV, which is slightly higher than that of low-temperature-operating superionic conductors (e.g., MgSc2Se4: 0.2 eV)3 but apparently lower than that of high-temperature-operating superionic conductors (e.g., MgZr4(PO4)6: 0.87 eV),2 indicating the efficient migration of the carriers in the COF channels in this temperature region.


image file: d4dt01424c-f4.tif
Fig. 4 Temperature dependence (30–160 °C) of ionic conductivity of TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg under N2. The inset shows an example of Nyquist plots (50 °C).

Conclusions

In conclusion, we demonstrated superionic conduction above 10−4 S cm−1 in a Mg2+-containing COF in the intermediate temperature region under guest-vapor-free conditions. The PEO-containing COF, TPB-PEO-9-COF-Mg, showed a superionic conductivity of 1.8 × 10−4 S cm−1 at 160 °C (tMg2+ = 0.31). We clarified that the long PEO chains deeply contribute to high ionic conductivity and incorporation of Mg2+ carriers in the COF. These results would provide important information for the development of COF-based ionic conductors and Mg2+-conductors based on such porous materials.

Data availability

All the data used are provided in the manuscript and the ESI.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the Shorai Foundation for Science and Technology, JSPS KAKENHI No. 21K05089, and JST FOREST No. JPMJFR211O.

References

  1. J. Zhang, Z. Chang, Z. Zhang, A. Du, S. Dong, Z. Li, G. Li and G. Cui, Current Design Strategies for Rechargeable Magnesium-Based Batteries, ACS Nano, 2021, 15, 15594–15624 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  2. S. Ikeda, M. Takahashi, J. Ishikawa and K. Ito, Solid Electrolytes with Multivalent Cation Conduction. 1. Conducting Species in Mg-Zr-PO4 system, Solid State Ionics, 1987, 23, 125–129 CrossRef CAS.
  3. P. Canepa, S.-H. Bo, G. S. Gautam, B. Key, W. D. Richards, T. Shi, Y. Tian, Y. Wang, J. Li and G. Ceder, High magnesium mobility in ternary spinel chalcogenides, Nat. Commun., 2017, 8, 1759 CrossRef PubMed.
  4. A. Omote, S. Yotsuhashi, Y. Zenitani and Y. Yamada, High Ion Conductivity in MgHf(WO4)3 Solids with Ordered Structure: 1-D Alignments of Mg2+ and Hf4+ Ions, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 2011, 94, 2285–2288 CrossRef CAS.
  5. M. Yoon, K. Suh, S. Natarajan and K. Kim, Proton Conduction in Metal–Organic Frameworks and Related Modularly Built Porous Solids, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2013, 52, 2688–2700 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  6. M. Sadakiyo and H. Kitagawa, Ion-conductive metal–organic frameworks, Dalton Trans., 2021, 50, 5385–5397 RSC.
  7. Y. Yoshida, K. Kato and M. Sadakiyo, Vapor-Induced Superionic Conduction of Magnesium Ions in a Metal–Organic Framework, J. Phys. Chem. C, 2021, 125, 21124–21130 CrossRef CAS.
  8. Y. Yoshida, T. Yamada, Y. Jing, T. Toyao, K. Shimizu and M. Sadakiyo, Super Mg2+ Conductivity around 10–3 S cm−1 Observed in a Porous Metal–Organic Framework, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2022, 144, 8669–8675 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  9. K. Aoki, K. Kato and M. Sadakiyo, High Mg2+ conduction in three-dimensional pores of a metal–organic framework under organic vapors, Dalton Trans., 2023, 52, 15313–15316 RSC.
  10. Q. Xu, S. Tao, Q. Jiang and D. Jiang, Ion Conduction in Polyelectrolyte Covalent Organic Frameworks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2018, 140, 7429–7432 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  11. G. Zhang, Y.-L. Hong, Y. Nishiyama, S. Bai, S. Kitagawa and S. Horike, Accumulation of Glassy Poly(ethylene oxide) Anchored in a Covalent Organic Framework as a Solid-State Li+ Electrolyte, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2019, 141, 1227–1234 CrossRef CAS PubMed.
  12. Y. Wang, K. Zhang, X. Jiang, Z. Liu, S. Bian, Y. Pan, Z. Shan, M. Wu, B. Xu and G. Zhang, Branched Poly(ethylene glycol)-Functionalized Covalent Organic Frameworks as Solid Electrolytes, ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2021, 4, 11720–11725 CrossRef CAS.
  13. S. Tamura, M. Yamane, Y. Hoshino and N. Imanaka, Highly conducting divalent Mg2+ cation solid electrolytes with well-ordered three-dimensional network structure, J. Solid State Chem., 2016, 235, 7–11 CrossRef CAS.

Footnote

Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Details of synthesis and physical measurements; Nyquist plots; dc polarization curve; list of activation energies; XRPD patterns. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dt01424c

This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2024
Click here to see how this site uses Cookies. View our privacy policy here.