Min
Ren
a,
Song-Song
Bao
a,
Bing-Wu
Wang
b,
Rute A. S.
Ferreira
c,
Li-Min
Zheng
*a and
Luis D.
Carlos
*c
aState Key Laboratory of Coordination Chemistry, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Collaborative Innovation Center of Advanced Microstructures, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China. E-mail: lmzheng@nju.edu.cn
bBeijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Rare Earth Materials Chemistry and Applications, College of Chemistry and Molecular Engineering, Peking University, Beijing 100871, P. R. China
cPhysics Department, CICECO, University of Aveiro, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. E-mail: lcarlos@ua.pt
First published on 20th April 2015
Two lanthanide(III) phosphonates [Ln(notpH4)(H2O)]ClO4·3H2O [Ln = Dy(1), Ho(2)] in which the lanthanide ion has a pseudo-D5h symmetry have been reported. Both show layer structures where the neighbouring lanthanide atoms are connected by a pair of O–P–O bridges. Magnetic studies reveal that field-induced slow relaxation can be observed in both cases. Complex 1 is of particular interest because it shows not only field-tunable dual relaxation processes originating from the single ion anisotropy as well as the spin collective effect, but also simultaneous emissions from the metal ion, the ligand and the radiative energy transfer from the ligand to metal. The emission of DyIII can be correlated to the magnetic data.
Since the f–f transitions are parity forbidden, the absorption coefficients of lanthanides are normally very low. In order to circumvent this drawback, organic ligands or coordination complexes with strongly absorbing chromophores can be used as “antenna” to transfer energy to the lanthanide ions. By taking advantage of the coordination capabilities of the phosphonate ligands towards lanthanide ions, we succeeded in isolating the compound DyIr6(ppy)12(bpp)2(bppH)4(CF3SO3)·8H2O (ppy− = 2-phenylpyridine, bpp2− = 2-pyridylphosphonate).34 It shows field-induced slow magnetic relaxation at low temperature as well as photoluminescence at room temperature originating from the iridium chromophore. The absence of luminescence from the central DyIII ion indicates that the energy transfer from the iridium chromophore is not efficient. The 1,4,7-triazacyclononane-1,4,7-triyl-tris(methylenephosphonic acid) (notpH6) can provide three nitrogen and nine oxygen donors to chelate and bridge the lanthanide ions into clusters or extended structures.35 Recently, we found that a layered erbium-notp compound [Er(notpH4)(H2O)]ClO4·3H2O can display dual functions with the observation of field-tunable slow magnetization relaxation and near-IR emission at low temperature.36 This compound also gives the first example of Er-SMMs that shows an optical and magnetic correlation. Considering that notpH6 does not contain an obvious absorbing chromophore such as an aromatic ring, we are interested in studying the luminescence properties of the ligand itself and whether an efficient energy transfer from this ligand can be extended to the other lanthanide ions such as dysprosium and holmium.
In this paper, we report two new Ln-notp compounds, namely, [Ln(notpH4)(H2O)]ClO4·3H2O [Ln = Dy(1), Ho(2)]. Both display layered structures in which the LnIII ions are connected by O–P–O bridges. Field-induced slow magnetic relaxation is observed in both cases at low temperature. Compound 1 is of particular interest because it shows not only field-tunable dual magnetic relaxation processes but also simultaneous emissions of the ligand, the DyIII ion and the radiative energy transfer from the ligand to metal. A correlation between the magnetic and luminescence properties is also demonstrated for compound 1.
The photoluminescence properties were investigated using a modular double grating excitation spectrofluorimeter with a TRIAX 320 emission monochromator (Fluorolog-3, Horiba Scientific) coupled to a R928 Hamamatsu photomultiplier, using a front face acquisition mode. The excitation source was a 450 W Xe arc lamp. The emission spectra were corrected for detection and optical spectral response of the spectrofluorimeter and the excitation spectra were corrected for the spectral distribution of the lamp intensity using a photodiode reference detector. The emission decay curves of the 4F9/2 (Dy3+) excited state were monitored with a Fluorolog TCSPC spectrofluorometer (Horiba Scientific) coupled to a TBX-04 photomultiplier tube module (950 V), 200 ns time-to-amplitude converter and 70 ns delay. The excitation source was a Horiba–Jobin–Yvon pulsed diode (NanoLED-390, peak at 390 nm, 1.2 ns pulse duration, 1 MHz repetition rate, and 150 ns synchronization delay).
Compound | 1 | 2 |
---|---|---|
a R 1 = ∑||F0| − |Fc||/∑|F0|; wR2 = [∑w(F02 − FC2)2/∑(FC2)2]1/2. | ||
Formula | C9H30DyN3O17P3 | C9H30HoN3O17P3 |
M | 743.22 | 745.65 |
Crystal system | Triclinic | Triclinic |
Space group | P | P |
a/Å | 9.1503(10) | 9.1535(8) |
b/Å | 9.2244(10) | 9.2424(8) |
c/Å | 15.1607(16) | 15.2450(13) |
α/° | 87.9626(18) | 88.2040(10) |
β /° | 76.3602(17) | 76.2920(10) |
γ /° | 75.8111(18) | 75.8130(10) |
Z | 2 | 2 |
V/Å3 | 1205.3(2) | 1214.29(18) |
D c/g cm−3 | 2.048 | 2.045 |
F(000) | 738 | 744 |
Goodness-of-fit on F2 | 1.00 | 1.069 |
R 1, wR2a [I > 2σ(I)] | 0.0252, 0.0599 | 0.0229, 0.0558 |
R 1, wR2 (all data) | 0.0274, 0.0605 | 0.0257, 0.0573 |
(Δρ)max, (Δρ)min/[e Å−3] | 0.81, −0.63 | 1.241, −0.980 |
CCDC number | 1041404 | 1041405 |
1 | 2 | |
---|---|---|
a Symmetry transformations used to generate equivalent atoms: A: −x + 1, −y, −z + 1; B: −x, −y, −z + 1; C: −x, −y + 1, −z + 1. | ||
Ln1–O1 | 2.257(3) | 2.248(3) |
Ln1–O8C | 2.212(3) | 2.204(3) |
Ln1–O4 | 2.435(2) | 2.430(2) |
Ln1–O6B | 2.257(3) | 2.252(2) |
Ln1–O7 | 2.263(3) | 2.261(2) |
Ln1–O2A | 2.302(3) | 2.305(3) |
Ln1–O1W | 2.483(3) | 2.472(3) |
O8C–Ln1–O6B | 81.29(10) | 81.40(9) |
O8C–Ln1–O7 | 88.73(10) | 88.02(9) |
O6B–Ln1–O7 | 147.87(10) | 147.54(10) |
O8C–Ln1–O1 | 172.96(10) | 172.64(9) |
O6B–Ln1–O1 | 104.24(10) | 104.45(9) |
O7–Ln1–O1 | 84.28(10) | 84.67(9) |
O8C–Ln1–O2A | 103.04(10) | 103.37(9) |
O6B–Ln1–O2A | 75.24(10) | 75.48(9) |
O7–Ln1–O2A | 136.89(10) | 136.97(10) |
O1–Ln1–O2A | 82.77(10) | 82.63(9) |
O8C–Ln1–O4 | 97.20(10) | 97.15(9) |
O6B–Ln1–O4 | 76.85(9) | 76.55(8) |
O7–Ln1–O4 | 74.21(9) | 74.44(8) |
O1–Ln1–O4 | 80.07(10) | 80.14(8) |
O2A–Ln1–O4 | 142.30(9) | 142.10(8) |
O8C–Ln1–O1W | 83.60(10) | 83.58(10) |
O6B–Ln1–O1W | 136.39(9) | 136.54(9) |
O7–Ln1–O1W | 71.66(10) | 71.59(9) |
O1–Ln1–O1W | 94.99(10) | 94.83(10) |
O2A–Ln1–O1W | 68.78(9) | 68.78(9) |
O4–Ln1–O1W | 145.84(9) | 145.98(8) |
The M versus H/T plots below 10 K show a linear increase in the magnetization at low fields and then more gradually above 7 kOe. The magnetizations at 70 kOe (5.35Nβ for 1, 5.61Nβ for 2 at 1.8 K) are not saturated, indicating the existence of magnetic anisotropy of the system and/or low-lying excited states (Fig. S6†). The non-superimposition of isothermal curves also confirms the presence of significant magnetic anisotropy.
To determine the splitting of the ground state of the lanthanide ions caused by the crystal field and predict the dynamic magnetic properties, we use the CONDON package to fit the dc magnetic susceptibilities for 1 and 2.42,43 The Hamiltonian can be expressed as eqn (1):
Ĥ = Ĥ0 + Ĥee + ĤSO + ĤCF + ĤM | (1) |
ĤCF = B02Ĉ02(i) + B04Ĉ04(i) + B06Ĉ06(i) | (2) |
A good fit of all the magnetic curves has been obtained from a unique set of CF parameters (Table S2†). The electronic fine structure can be obtained from the CF parameters (Fig. 3). For complex 1, the ground state doublet is a mixture of MJ = ±13/2 with MJ = ±3/2. The first excited state MJ = ±9/2 is a little close in energy at 12 cm−1. The doublet MJ = ±15/2 which has the largest MJ values lies far from the ground state at 176 cm−1 (Fig. 3). For complex 2, the ground state is a mixture of MJ = ±7 and MJ = ±3, while the first excited state is MJ = ±6 mixed with MJ = ±2 which lies 20 cm−1 above the ground state. The doublet MJ = ±8 state shows the highest energy of Zeeman splitting at 372 cm−1 (Fig. 3).
(3) |
(4) |
The optimum field Hm = 1.5 kOe of relaxation A is a competition result of the QTM effect and direct moment reversal processes. Under a lower external dc field, the degeneracy of the ground ±MJ levels is split, reducing the degree of mixing and mitigating the quantum tunneling process; while under a higher dc field the emergence of the direct relaxation process between the non-degenerate ±MJ levels accelerated the relaxation process again. To model the field dependence of τ, eqn (5) was introduced:49
(5) |
The first term represents the direct process, while the second corresponds to the zero-field QTM. The results are shown in Fig. S10,† and the values of A, B1 and B2 are given in Table S6.†
The magnetic dynamics of compound 1 was investigated in detail under 0.5 kOe and 1.5 kOe dc fields. Fig. S11† shows the temperature dependence of ac signals, measured under 0.5 kOe dc field. Both χ′M and χ′′M signals are frequency dependent with the peaks appearing below 4 K. The ac susceptibility with frequency scan below 4 K shows dominant peaks in the high frequency region, corresponding to relaxation A (Fig. 5a). The maxima of the χ′′M(ν) peaks shift to lower frequencies upon cooling, confirming that the relaxation A is thermally activated. Notably, shoulders are also visible in the χ′′M(ν) curves below 3 K, corresponding to relaxation B. The weight ratio of relaxation A and B (fA:fB) increases from 0.81:0.19 at 1.8 K to 0.92:0.08 upon heating to 3.2 K (Table S7†). It is interesting that the dual relaxation processes become more significant when the external dc field is increased to 1.5 kOe (Fig. 5b). The intensity of the two peaks in χ′′M are comparable at 1.8 K (fB = 0.52), but that of relaxation B decreases dramatically upon heating (fB = 0.25 at 4 K) (Table S8†).
The relaxation times can be extracted from the fitting of eqn (3) or eqn (4) (Tables S7 and S8†). For relaxation A, the temperature dependent relaxation time profiles can be fitted as a sum of the contributions of the quantum tunneling, direct, Raman, and Orbach relaxation mechanisms, shown in eqn (6):50
(6) |
The third term represents the Raman relaxation process which occurs via a virtual excited state with n = 9 for the Kramers ions. The last term represents the Orbach relaxation process which occurs via a real excited state, typically for SMM behavior. To avoid possible meaningless fits as a result of overparameterization, the values of A, B1 and B2 are taken from fits to the field-dependent τ data (Table S6†). The best fits to eqn (6) lead to extremely small C values (close to zero), indicating that the Raman relaxation can be negligible. Assuming that C = 0, the anisotropic energy barriers can be obtained as Ueff = 39.9 ± 1.1 K (τ0 = 9.0 ± 0.9 × 10−10 s) for data measured at 0.5 kOe, and Ueff = 41.6 ± 1.3 K (τ0 = 1.3 ± 0.3 × 10−9 s) for data measured at 1.5 kOe, respectively (Fig. 6, Table S6†). The C values are very small. Also, the energy barriers remain almost unchanged while the relaxation time increases in the whole temperature range by increasing the external dc field, in accordance with the reducing degree of mixing and mitigating the quantum tunneling process.
It is noted that the relaxation times of relaxation B are 1–2 orders of magnitude larger than those of relaxation A, and show weak temperature dependence at low temperature, suggesting a direct relaxation mechanism (Fig. 6). When the external field is 1.5 kOe, the temperature dependence of the relaxation time is visible above 3 K for relaxation B. The Arrhenius fit results in the energy barrier of U = 19.4 ± 2.4 K (τ0 = 7 ± 4 × 10−5 s). Considering that the relative intensity of relaxation B is low in the high temperature region, the relaxation times extracted from the modified Debye models could not be quite reliable. To further explore the origin of the two relaxation processes in 1, the dynamic properties of the diamagnetically diluted sample 1a (10.3% DyIII doped into a YIII-based matrix) were investigated.
As shown in Fig. S19,† the χ′′M(ν) plots of 1a show well-shaped single peaks at 2 K under 0.1–3 kOe dc fields, associated with a single relaxation process (relaxation A′). The lnτ vs. H profile for 1a is similar to that for 1, but the relaxation time is much longer in the former case (6.46(13) ms for 1avs. 2.48(2) ms for 1 at 1.5 kOe) (Fig. 4). This can be explained by the suppression of the QTM effect upon dilution. The field dependence of τ can be fitted with eqn (5), and the derived parameters of A, B1 and B2 are given in Table S6.† The parameters are different from those obtained for compound 1, which may be related to the inefficient QTM via dipolar interactions upon dilution and other variables such as the crystal density, the speed of sound in the solid, and the strength of the interaction of the spin system with the phonons.51
The temperature and frequency dependent ac magnetic susceptibilities of 1a were measured under 1.5 kOe (Fig. S21–23†). The relaxation times extracted from the Debye model were fitted with eqn (6). The anisotropy barrier of the Orbach process is 38.2 ± 2.6 K (τ0 = 3.1 ± 0.6 × 10−10 s), close to that for relaxation A in compound 1 (Fig. S24†). The results demonstrate that the relaxation A in compound 1 is of single-ion anisotropy origin. Noting that the relaxation B disappears in the diluted sample 1a, the weak magnetic interactions between the DyIII ions must play an important role in the relaxation process.
The energy barrier for compound 1 is relatively smaller than other reported Dy-based SMMs in D5h symmetry.17,18 The weak easy-axis anisotropy could be explained by the coordination geometry of DyIII ions in 1 which deviates significantly from an idealized five-fold symmetry. As a result, the axial crystal field Wybourne notation B02, B04, B06 parameters could be reduced, and non-axial parameters (Bqk, q ≠ 0) could have non-zero values, which may induce the QTM effect.
The observation of dual thermally activated relaxation processes with extremely different relaxation times is unusual in Ln-based SMMs. This phenomenon was first observed by Long et al. in studying the magnetic dynamics of U(Ph2BPz2)3.52 They proposed that the faster relaxation is of single ion origin, while the very slow relaxation is attributed to a collective spin relaxation brought about by short-range intermolecular ordering. Another two examples showing similar behavior are a mononuclear Dy–TTF complex reported by Pointillart et al.53 and [Er(notpH4)(H2O)]ClO4·3H2O described by us.36
It is interesting to compare the magnetic behavior of compound 1 with that of [Er(notpH4)(H2O)]ClO4·3H2O in which the ErIII ions are cross-linked by O–P–O units.36 According to Rinehart and Long, axial and equatorial ligand fields are required to stabilize the most oblate DyIII and prolate ErIII ions, respectively.54 The similar energy barriers obtained for compound 1 and its Er-analogue can be explained by the deviation of coordination spheres around the DyIII or ErIII ions from the ideal pentagonal bipyramidal geometry in the two complexes (Table 3). Noting that both DyIII and ErIII are Kramers ions, we are curious to know whether a similar field-induced multiple relaxation could occur in analogous compounds containing non-Kramers ions such as HoIII (5I8). Therefore the magnetic dynamics of compound 2 was investigated.
Fig. S25† gives the ac susceptibilities of 2 measured at zero dc field showing neither peak nor frequency dependence. The application of an external field of 1.5 kOe switches on the χ′′M signals which become temperature dependent below 6 K (Fig. S27–29†). However no peaks are observed down to 1.8 K. The relaxation time τ can be extracted from the Debye model fitting the Cole–Cole plots at indicated temperatures. The anisotropic energy barrier is estimated to be 5.5 ± 0.2 K (τ0 = 8.4 ± 0.6 × 10−7 s) according to the Arrhenius law (Fig. S30†). This value is much smaller than that of compound 1, attributed to the effective QTM through transverse anisotropy. Obviously, the field-induced dual relaxation process is not visible in compound 2.
The photoluminescence of 1 was investigated in the solid state at room temperature (Fig. S31†) and at 14 K (Fig. 7). Under direct intra-4f excitation (349 nm, 6H15/2) the emission spectrum reveals the characteristic 4F9/2 → 6H15/2,13/2,11/2 (479, 571 and 661 nm, respectively) DyIII lines, superimposed on a broad band with two components at 415 nm and 525 nm, also observed in the emission spectra of the metal-free notpH6 ligand (Fig. S32†). A series of self-absorptions ascribed to intra-4f DyIII transitions (marked with vertical lines) are also observed, pointing out the presence of radiative energy transfer (part of the emitted light is absorbed by the DyIII ions and subsequently converted into f–f emission). Such radiative energy transfer has been previously observed and named the “inner filter” effect.55 The self-absorptions are also clearly observed in the excitation spectra monitored within the ligand emission (415 nm, Fig. 7b) superimposed on a broad band peak in the UV region ascribed to the ligand excited states (Fig. S32†). The excitation spectrum monitored around the maximum intensity peak position of the DyIII emission (571 nm) displays the ligand related bands, another component around 256 nm attributed to a ligand-to-metal-charge-transfer band (LMCT) and a series of DyIII transitions between the 6H15/2 level and the 4D7/2, 4K13/2,17/2, 6P3/2,5/2, 4F5/2–9/2, 4H13/2,15/2, 4M9/2, 4I13/2, and 4G11/2 excited states.56
These intra-4f lines are also observed in the UV-visible reflectance spectrum (Fig. 7c). We should note that the LMCT band is not observed in the excitation spectrum selectively monitored within the ligand emission at 415 nm (Fig. 7b) and in the reflectance spectrum of 1 (Fig. 7c) and in the excitation spectra of the isolated ligand (Fig. S32†). The larger relative intensity of the intra-4f lines indicates that the main excitation path for the DyIII ions is through direct intra-4f excitation. In the diluted sample 1a, the absence of the self-absorptions suggests that the radiative ligand-to-DyIII energy transfer is absent, possibly due to the low concentration of DyIII (Fig. S34†).
The 4F9/2 emission decay curves were monitored at 571 nm for 1 being well reproduced by a single exponential function, in good agreement with the presence of a single average DyIII local environment (Fig. S36†). From the fit, the 4F9/2 lifetime values are 4.59 ± 0.13 ns and 3.78 ± 0.09 ns, at 14 K and at room temperature, respectively. These values are lower than those measured for other DyIII-based complexes reported in the literature,20,23 which may be explained by the presence of OH oscillators from one coordinated water in the first coordination shell of 1 and/or concentration quenching.
In order to experimentally investigate the crystal field splitting of the ground state of the DyIII ions in 1, the 14 K high-resolution emission spectrum in the spectral region of the 6F9/2 → 6H15/2 transition was acquired, as illustrated in Fig. 8.
The maximum Stark splitting of the 6H15/2 levels is eight, pointing out the presence of two transitions arising from “hot” bands involving the first Stark component of the 7F9/2 level. The assignment of the transitions is proposed in Fig. 8b which allows us to establish the energy diagram of the Stark-sub-levels. The energy gap between the ground and first excited states of the 6H15/2 crystal field splitting (ΔE, Fig. 8) is 56.1 ± 12.9 K (39.0 ± 9.0 cm−1), which agrees well with the energy barrier extracted from the ac magnetic studies (41.4 K).
The photoluminescence properties of 2 were also investigated in the UV-visible range. The emission of HoIII could not be observed due to the non-radiative deactivation processes from the emissive state of 5S2.4 The ligand emission concomitant with the radiative energy transfer from ligand-to-HoIII can be obviously observed in the excitation and emission spectra (Fig. S39 and S40†), in which several negative sharp peaks associated with the self-absorption of the HoIII appear on the broadband of ligand excitation and emission. The positions of these peaks are well coinciding with the absorption spectra of 2, corresponding to the absorption from the ground state 5I8 to excited states of (5G, 5D, 3G)4 (287 nm), 3K6 (334 nm), 3H6 (360 nm), (5G, 3G)5 (417 nm), 5G6 (452 nm), 5K8 (472 nm), 5F3 (486 nm), 5F4 (536 nm), 5S2 (545 nm), by referring to HoIII aqua ions.56
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Thermal analyses, PXRD patterns, additional magnetic and photoluminescence data. CCDC 1041404 and 1041405. For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: 10.1039/c4qi00242c |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2015 |