Yingjie
Cai‡
a,
Dasheng
Yang‡
a,
Ruixue
Yin
*a,
Yang
Gao
*a,
Hongbo
Zhang
*a and
Wenjun
Zhang
b
aSchool of Mechanical and Power Engineering, East China University of Science and Technology, Shanghai, China. E-mail: yinruixue@ecust.edu.cn; yanggao@ecust.edu.cn; hbzhang@ecust.edu.cn
bDivision of Biomedical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada
First published on 7th October 2020
Glucose sensors are vital devices for blood glucose detection in the diabetes care. Different from traditional electrochemical devices based on glucose oxidase, the glucose sensor based on the glucose-responsive hydrogel is more robust owing to its enzyme-free principle. However, integrating the high sensitivity, fast response, wide measuring range and low-cost fabrication into a hydrogel sensor is still challenging. In this study, we present a physical capacitive sensor, which consists of interdigital carbon electrodes (ICEs) fabricated by a direct laser writing technology and glucose-responsive hydrogel (DexG-Con A hydrogel) built by UV curing in situ. The dielectric property of DexG-Con A hydrogel changes accordingly with the change in environmental glucose concentration. Experimental results demonstrate that in a glucose concentration range of 0–30 mM, the proposed hydrogel sensor is capable of measuring the glucose level in a repeatable and reversible manner, showing a short responsive time of less than 2 min and a high sensitivity of 8.81 pF mM−1 at a glucose range of 0–6 mM. Owing to its simple fabrication process, low-cost and high performance, the proposed glucose sensor shows great potential on batch production for continuous glucose monitoring application.
The traditional glucose sensor relied on the conversion of glucose into gluconolactone and hydrogenperoxide (H2O2) by using glucose oxidase (GOx), which may generate interference and finally cause false read-outs of CGM devices.4 In addition, the enzyme sensors are consumptive and irreversible, which easily causes large drifts when the external demand changes. In order to overcome the instability and low accuracy of enzyme-based sensors, lot of substrates (such as carbon nanotubes, inorganic nanostructures and robust hydrogels) have been proposed for GOx immobilization.5,6 However, these methods may increase the complexity in sensor fabrication, require high operation skills,7 and involve high costs. Therefore, non-enzymatic glucose sensors have been developed alternatively. Metal catalysts (such as Ag, Pt and Au, or some metallic oxides like CuO, NiO, MnO and ZnO) were used to directly catalyze glucose.8–10 Unfortunately, these sensors usually cannot avoid the disturbance of active molecules like dopamine, uric acid, ascorbic acid, KCl, NaCl and fructose. They also have a small glucose detecting range,11,12 which cannot cover a target range of 4–10 mM for the blood glucose control of diabetic patients.13
Glucose-responsive hydrogels based on reversible specific binding between glucose-binding molecules and glucose are good candidates as an enzyme-free detection element for the glucose sensor, benefitting from its biocompatibility, rapid responsibility and easily adjusted network structure.14 The swelling of such a responsive hydrogel can be programmed according to an external glucose stimulus, leading to the corresponding change of physical property (e.g., refractive index, vibration, elastic modulus, resistance), which can be measured as a sensing signal. Phenylboronic acid (PBA)15–18 and concanavalin A (Con A)-based glucose-responsive hydrogels19–21 are two widely investigated groups to fabricate hydrogel-based enzyme-free glucose sensors. PBA is a chemically synthesized agent that shows reversible affinity to compounds with adjacent hydroxyl groups. Con A is a glucose-binding lectin extracted from the Jack bean, which exhibits strong reversible affinity for the pyranose ring with unmodified –OH at the C-3, C-4 and C-6 positions.22 Compared with the PBA-contained hydrogel, the Con A-based hydrogel has better biocompatibility and a much stronger specificity for sugar.23 Until now, Con A-based hydrogels in the form of a hollow fiber and thin film have been developed as optical glucose sensors.24,25 Nevertheless, integrating high sensitivity, wide measuring range and low-cost fabrication into the Con A-based hydrogel sensor is still challenging.
In this study, for the first time, we present a physical capacitive sensor integrated by glycidyl methacrylate dextran (DexG)-Con A hydrogel and interdigital carbon electrodes (ICEs) to address the aforementioned issues. The DexG-Con A hydrogel has shown great performance on glucose-responsive insulin release in our previous report.2 This hydrogel has a dual-network structure that consists of a chemical-crosslinked network among DexG molecules and a physical-crosslinked network between DexG and Con A. The chemical-crosslinked network contributes to the mechanical support, which may enable a long service life of the sensor, and the physical-crosslinked network dominates the reversible binding process of Con A and glucose. The network composition of the DexG-Con A hydrogel can be easily adjusted to meet the requirements for sensor design. The coplanar electrode is another distinctive factor of this sensor for its one-access side, which can couple with the responsive hydrogel. Kapton was used as the substrate to form an interdigital carbon electrode by direct laser writing. It is a rapid, inexpensive way to obtain carbon electrodes and can obviate the time-consuming lithography process.26–29 The dielectric property of the DexG-Con A hydrogel changes accordingly with the change of the environmental glucose concentration, and the signal change can be measured through ICEs, transducing the concentration signal into capacitance signal. Experimental results demonstrate that in a glucose concentration range of 0–30 mM, the proposed hydrogel sensor has the ability to measure the glucose level in a repeatable and reversible manner, showing a short responsive time of less than 2 min and has a high sensitivity of 8.81 pF mM−1 at a glucose range of 0–6 mM. Owing to its simple fabrication process, low-cost and high performance, the proposed glucose sensor has great potential on batch production for continuous glucose monitoring application.
The DexG-Con A hydrogel has a dual-network structure for glucose detection. As illustrated in Fig. 1b, the covalent bonding among the DexG molecules supplies mechanical support for the hydrogel, while the specific physical binding between Con A and DexG contributes to the glucose-responsiveness.2 The competitive binding between DexG-Con A and glucose (Glu)-Con A affects the structure of the DexG-Con A network, and thus induces volume and permittivity change of the hydrogel. Furthermore, the binding process can be expressed by eqn (1) and (2), according to the ligand competition theory:2,31
ConA + DexG ⇌ ConA-DexG | (1) |
ConA + Glu ⇌ ConA-Glu | (2) |
As shown in Fig. 1c, when the glucose concentration increases, the Con A molecules have the priority to bind with glucose rather than DexG, causing the equilibrium of eqn (2) to shift towards the right side. At the same time, the equilibrium of eqn (1) shifts towards the left side. This leads to the expansion of the DexG-Con A network, and thus the swelling and permittivity change of the hydrogel. On the contrary, the hydrogel responds when the glucose concentration decreases.
Most of all, the permittivity change of the hydrogel caused by the concentration change of glucose can be detected using the ICEs by measuring the capacitance and impedance variations. The complex permittivity (ε*) of a substance can be presented by the following equation:
ε* = ε − jε′ | (3) |
The surface morphology of the obtained carbon layer at the laser power of 4.55 W was studied, as illustrated in Fig. 2b. The laser ablation generated a porous carbon layer on the PI surface with a flake-like carbon species, which is similar to the laser generated structure reported by Wang et al.34Fig. 2c shows the Raman spectrum of the ICEs prepared at the laser power of 4.55 W. Three peaks located at 1350 (D-band), 1585 (G-band), and 2696 (2D-band) cm−1 were identified, which are due to the defects and disordered structures of graphitic carbons, sp2-hybridized graphitic carbon atoms, and the second order zone-boundary phonons of graphitic carbon, respectively.27 The value of ID/IG (the intensity ratio of the D peak and G peak) is 0.5039, indicating the good quality of the laser-generated carbon layer.35Fig. 2d illustrates the XPS spectrum of the carbon layer prepared at the laser power of 4.55 W. Compared to the O/C atomic ratio for the unablated PI film (∼18.3),36 the carbon generated by the laser has a much smaller O/C atomic ratio of 0.03. The decreased O/C atomic ratio after LDW could be ascribed to the gas release during the carbonization process.37 The curve-fitted XPS spectra for the C 1s and O 1s peaks are shown in Fig. 2e and f, respectively. The three peaks in the C 1s XPS spectrum are each assigned to C–C (284.8 eV), C–O (285.58 eV) and CO (289.88 eV). The two peaks in the O 1s XPS spectrum each correspond to CO (532.34 eV) and C–O (533.2 eV). The spectrum in Fig. 2e has a relatively higher C–C peak than the C–O and CO peaks. The high content of carbon ensures good electrical conductivity of the obtained ICEs.
Fig. 3b and c show that the impedance and capacitance of the hydrogel sensor vary monotonically with increasing glucose concentration under each given voltage frequency. At a given low frequency, e.g., 1 kHz, the capacitance decreased from 7.08 to 2.23 nF. In addition, the impedance increased from 1186 to 1554 Ω as the glucose concentration changed within a wide range of 0–30 mM. The wide detection range of 0–30 mM is essential for glucose monitoring of diabetes patients. The same wide detection range has been reported in Zhang's work.41 The capacitance decrease tendency was also found at a typical higher frequency of 30 kHz, showing the decrease of capacitance from 69.0 to 25.2 pF and the increase of impedance from 1134 to 1524 Ω. A similar difference in capacitance (ΔC/C0 mM) was observed at different frequencies when the sensor was exposed to varied glucose concentrations (Fig. S3†). These results suggest that the change in the glucose concentration can be detected under different frequencies, which is of great potential for integration in a glucose detecting device. A high frequency of 30 kHz and a low frequency of 1 kHz were taken as examples for capacitance measurements in the following experiments. Determining which frequency should be chosen for the potential sensor device may depend on the convertor used for device integration.16
To test the glucose-responsive property of the proposed sensor, it was positioned into a series concentrations of glucose buffer solution, and the capacitance was measured (considering 30 kHz, for example) in response to the glucose concentration changes. The capacitance of the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor decreased monotonically with glucose concentration increment, and then reached a saturated state at the glucose concentration of about 30 mM (Fig. 3d). Moreover, the sensitivity of the sensor was calculated by eqn (4), where ΔC and ΔGlu were defined as the capacitance and the concentration difference, respectively.
Sensitivity = ΔC/ΔGlu | (4) |
Although the capacitance of the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor showed a nonlinear dependence on the wide glucose concentration range of 0–30 mM, it displayed a partitioned linear dependence with varied sensitivity on each portion. The hydrogel sensor exhibited the highest sensitivity of 8.81 pF mM−1 at the glucose concentration range of 0–6 mM (R2 = 0.98), which showed great potential on the hypoglycemia diagnosis. Because the glucose level for sweat is 0.28–1.11 mM,42 this sensor may function well for glucose detection in sweat. The sensitivity of the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor decreased with the increase of the glucose concentration above 6 mM. The sensitivity at the glucose concentration range of 9–15 mM was 0.640 pF mM−1 with an R square value of 0.98, and the sensitivity at the glucose concentration range of 15–25 mM was 0.142 pF mM−1 with an R square value of 0.95. A possible reason for the decreased sensitivity of the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor lies in the reduced available binding sites on Con A with increased glucose concentration, causing the limitation of hydrogel swelling. Importantly, it can be found from Fig. 3e that the capacitance of ICEs is about two orders of magnitude lower than that of the whole sensor. In addition, it did not follow a monotonic pattern, indicating that the variation tendency of the sensor capacitance did not relate to the inherent nature of ICEs. As a sensor with a wide detecting range of glucose concentration, the proposed DexG-Con A sensor exhibits higher sensitivity compared to other capacitance glucose sensors, including two microsensors recorded by the Lin group with the sensitivity of 0.04 pF mM−1 at 0–5.56 mM (measured at 32 kHz)16 and 0.27 pF mM−1 at 0–2.22 mM (measured at 30 kHz).18 In addition, Fig. S4† reveals that the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor has good stability in real-time detection over 1000 s (Fig. S4b†) and long-term working (Fig. S4a†).
The reversible response to glucose is one great advantage of both phenylboronic acid-based and Con A-based hydrogel sensors.18,25,43,44 To explore the reversible glucose response of the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor, the capacitance in response to the glucose solution with repeated concentration change between 0 and 3 mM was recorded (see the real-time capacitance change in response to the glucose concentration change from 0 mM to 3 mM as an example in Fig. S5†), and the results are shown in Fig. 3f. The recovery ratio calculated by eqn (5) was used to demonstrate the recovery extent of the DexG-Con A hydrogel, where C represents the measured capacitance at the repeated glucose concentration change from 0 to 3 mM for seven cycles, respectively, and C0 mM represents the measured capacitance at the glucose concentration of 0 mM for the first cycle.
recovery ratio = C/C0 mM | (5) |
The calculated value at the glucose concentration of 0 mM was among 0.987–1.016, while the value at the glucose concentration of 3 mM was decreased to 0.503–0.605. These results indicate that the glucose-binding of the developed hydrogel has good reversibility.
To verify the ability of the proposed DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor for continuous glucose sensing, an in vitro test platform was designed based on the fluid channel to perform continuous measurement. A peristaltic pump was used to exchange the glucose concentrations, and each solution change interval was less than 8 s, which was negligible for the whole experiment. The results are shown in Fig. 4a. As the glucose concentration changed from 5 to 30 mM, the value of Ct/C0 (where Ct represents the capacitance measured at time t and C0 represents the capacitance measured at 0 s, recorded at 1 kHz for example) of the DexG-Con A sensor decreased from 1 to 0.24. At a given concentration of glucose, the sensor responded fast and retained a relatively stable equilibrium. When the glucose concentration is 5 mM, the capacitance of the sensor can reach an equilibrium in less than 2 min. The faster response can be found with increased glucose level, owing to the higher osmotic pressure and faster binding reaction of Con A-glucose (according to eqn (2), a higher glucose concentration can cause faster equilibrium). A fast response has also been reported by the Zhang group in their hydrogel sensors.45,46 Although the response of the hydrogel sensors is usually slow, the thinness and the glucose-responsive principle of the DexG-Con A hydrogel may contribute to the fast change in response to different glucose concentrations. The physical binding between Con A and the sugar units directly induces the composition and conformational change of the hydrogel without any chemical reactions or ionization process.2
When the glucose sensor works in vivo, except for glucose molecule, other small molecules that exist in the interstitial fluid (including fructose, galactose, lactate, and ascorbic acid) may affect its capacitance. The physiological concentration of these disturbances is about one order of magnitude lower than the normal glucose level.16 In response to disturbances in the 5 mM glucose buffer solution, the capacitance of the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor with their concentration of ten percent of glucose was measured (at 30 kHz), and is shown in Fig. 4b. Here, we use the capacitance ratio to indicate the glucose response in the presence of potential disturbances, which is calculated according to Cd/Cg, where Cg is the capacitance of the glucose solution (5 mM), and Cd is the capacitance of the glucose solution in the presence of different disturbances. The obtained capacitance ratio in response to the existence of ascorbic acid, galactose, lactate and fructose is 0.97, 0.99, 1.01, 0.96, respectively. This demonstrates that the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor is resistant to the disturbances of small molecules in the interstitial fluid. These results indicate that the DexG-Con A hydrogel sensor is promising for implantable devices.
Footnotes |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: 10.1039/d0an01672a |
‡ Authors contributed equally. |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2021 |