Mina Keihanfara,
Bi Bi Fatemeh Mirjalili*a and
Abdolhamid Bamonirib
aDepartment of Chemistry, College of Science, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran
bDepartment of Organic Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Kashan, Kashan, Iran. E-mail: fmirjalili@yazd.ac.ir; Fax: +98 3538210644; Tel: +983531232672
First published on 14th June 2023
Sb(III)–Gum Arabic composite as a unique natural-based and nontoxic catalyst was synthesized and characterized by FT-IR, XRD, TGA, ICP, BET, EDX and mapping. A four-component reaction of phthalic anhydride, hydrazinium hydroxide, aldehyde, and dimedone has been carried out in the presence of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite to synthesise 2H-indazolo[2,1-b] phthalazine triones. The advantages of the present protocol are the appropriate reaction times, eco-friendly nature and high yields.
The above mentioned catalysts have high yields,6–8,11 short reaction times,7,10,11 easy work-up procedure,7,10,11 solvent-free condition6,11 and reusability of catalyst.12
Some procedures have disadvantages such as strong acid condition10 and no reusability catalyst.8–10
Sb(III) is a good Lewis acid for activation of carbonyl compound.
Herein, we have supported Sb(III) on Gum Arabic to preparation of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic as a heterogonous acid catalyst. Thus, we report an eco-friendly protocol for the synthesis of 2H-indazolo[2,1-b] phthalazinetriones in the presence of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite as a new natural-based green reusable catalyst via the reaction of dimedone, phthalic anhydride, hydrazinium hydroxide and aldehydes (Scheme 1).
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra recorded by ATR method on a Bruker (EQUINOX 55) spectrometer. The nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra were recorded in DMSO-d6 on Bruker (DRX-400, Avance) NMR 400 MHz. Melting points were determined by a Büchi B-540 instrument. Field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) apparatus (Mira 3-XMU) was used for recording of FESEM images. The XRD graph of catalyst was obtained by X-ray diffractometer (XRD, Bruker-binary V3) using a Cu kα anode (k = 1.54 Å, radiation at 36 kV and 36 mA) in the 2θ range from 10° to 80°. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) and maps of catalyst were recorded by Phenom pro X. Thermal gravimetric analysis (TGA) was done using “BÄHR-(model: STA 503)” instrument. BELSORP MINI II nitrogen adsorption apparatus (Japan) was used for recording of Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) specific surface area of catalyst at 77 K. Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) was recorded by AGILENT 7500 apparatus. All IR and 1H NMR spectra data are available in ESI (Fig. S1–S20).†
The structure of prepared Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite was studied using FTIR, XRD, BET, FE-SEM, TGA, EDX(EDS), elemental mapping and ICP. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy spectra of Gum Arabic and Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite were shown in Fig. 1. In Gum Arabic spectrum, the characteristic absorption bands at 1068 and 1145 cm−1 (C–O, stretch), 1610 (O–H, bending), 2926 cm−1 (C–H, stretch), and 3389 cm−1 (O–H, stretch) can be observed. In Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite spectrum, the additional bands at 586 and 682 are assigned to the Sb–O stretching vibrations.
The XRD pattern of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite in 2θ = 10–80° is shown in Fig. 2. The broad peak at 2θ = 19.43 relates to the amorphous Gum Arabic and 2θ = 25.46, 28.41 attributed to Sb(III).
The surface morphology of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite was characterized using FESEM analysis (Fig. 3). According to the FESEM images, the particles are spherical with the size in the range of nanomaterial. The histogram of the size distribution detected by MIRA 3 TESCAN software in FESEM.
Fig. 3 FESEM image (a) and particle size distribution histogram of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite (b). |
Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy EDS (EDX) analysis was applied for the identification of elemental composition in Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite (Fig. 4). The EDX data confirmed the existence of N, O and Sb elements in the catalyst.
The weight percentages of Sb(III) in catalyst was studied by inductively coupled plasma (ICP). According to obtained data, the weight percentage of Sb(III) is 43% (Fig. S21, ESI†).
The elemental mapping of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite was shown in (Fig. S22, ESI†) which confirmed homogenous distribution of C, N, O, Sb in catalyst.
Fig. 5 shows the thermal gravimetric analysis (TG-DTA) of the Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite in 20–900 °C. The obtained results indicated that there were three weight loss steps. The first observed weight loss of sample occurred at 100–200 °C due to removal of the catalyst moisture. The second step of weight loss, in 280–320 °C, was a result of dehydration and decarboxylation of Gum Arabic. The third step of weight loss occurs in the 343–663 °C range, most likely due to complete decomposition of the glycoprotein of Gum Arabic. Finally, the high weight of ash can be improved the presence of Sb(III) ion in catalyst.
The nitrogen adsorption–desorption graph, BET plot, Langmuir plot, t plot and BJH plot were shown in (Fig. S23, ESI†), which were used to determine the specific surface area, volume and distribution of pores. Nitrogen adsorption was measured on gas-depleted samples at 77 K. The adsorption–desorption isotherm is the type of III while indicating the presence of broader pore size distributions with H3 type hysteresis loop for Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite, which is consistent with the IUPAC classification. The Brunauer–Emmett–Teller surface area (SBET), total pore volume and mean pore diameter of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite were determined as 2.2 m2 g−1, 0.006 cm3 g−1 and 10.5 nm, respectively (Table 1).
BET plot | |
---|---|
Vmicro, (cm3 g−1) | 0.5 |
S(BET), (m2 g−1) | 2.2 |
V (Σ), (cm3 g−1) | 0.006 |
Dpore, (nm) | 10.5 |
Entry | Solvent | Conditions | Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite (g) | Time (min) | Yieldb (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
a Phthalic anhydride (1 mmol), hydrazinium hydroxide (1.2 mmol), 4-chlorobenzaldehyde (1 mmol) and dimedone (1 mmol).b Isolated yield. | |||||
1 | — | R.T | 0.08 | 120 | 28 |
2 | — | 70 °C | 0.08 | 30 | 97 |
3 | — | Grinding/60 °C | 0.08 | 80 | 60 |
4 | — | 50 °C | 0.08 | 85 | 40 |
5 | — | 65 °C | 0.08 | 25 | 75 |
6 | EtOH | Reflux | 0.08 | 50 | 62 |
7 | H2O | Reflux | 0.08 | 120 | 54 |
8 | — | 70 °C | 0.07 | 40 | 80 |
9 | — | 70 °C | 0.06 | 45 | 74 |
Entry | R | Time (min) | Yieldb (%) | m.p. (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
a Reaction conditions: aldehyde (1 mmol), phthalic anhydride (1 mmol), hydrazinium hydroxide (1.2 mmol) and dimedone (1 mmol), Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite (0.08 g) solvent-free and 70 °C.b Isolated yield. | ||||
1 | 4-HCOO | 120 | 94 | 265–267 |
2 | 4-Cl | 30 | 97 | 263–265 |
3 | 3-Cl | 35 | 95 | 185–187 |
4 | 4-OH | 35 | 90 | 262–264 |
5 | 3-NO2 | 32 | 91 | 270 |
6 | 4-CH3 | 40 | 89 | 232–234 |
7 | 4-OCH3 | 43 | 90 | 214–216 |
8 | 2-OH-5-Br | 37 | 92 | 265 |
9 | 4-NO2 | 30 | 93 | 228–230 |
10 | 4-Isopropyl | 60 | 87 | 258–260 |
According to Hammet correlation, the presence of electron-withdrawing group in para positon of aromatic aldehyde (4-COOH σpara = 0.45, 4-Cl σpara = 0.23, 4-NO2 σpara = 0.78) caused increasing of the yield of reaction and electron-donating group in para position (4-OH σpara = −0.37, 4-CH3 σpara = −0.17, 4-OCH3 σpara = −0.27) reduced the yield of reaction.
The proposed mechanism for the synthesis of 2H-indazolo[2,1-b] phthalazinetrione is shown in Scheme 2. It was anticipated that, at first, the Sb(III) Lowis acid in Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite activates the carbonyl group of aldehyde to condensation with dimedone to form adduct (I). In continue, phthalhydrazide react with adduct (I) via a Michael-type addition to produce the intermediate (II). Finally, the OH group in intermediate (II) was activated by catalyst to production of product (III) via an intramolecular cyclization.
Scheme 2 A plausible mechanism for the formation of 2H-indazolo[2,1-b] phthalazinetrione in the presence of Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite. |
The comparison between our reported protocol with others was done and the results were tabulated in Table 4.
Ent. | Catal. | Cond. | Time (min) | Yield (%) [ref.] | Product (mmol)/catalyst (g) | Catalyst (g)/reaction mixture (g) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
a A: poly phosphoric acid–SiO2, B: Fe3O4@SiO2–ZrCl2-MNPs, C: Sb(III)/Gum Arabic composite. | ||||||
1 | CAN (5 mol%) | PEG 400, 50 °C | 120 | 94 (ref. 13) | 0.94/0.027 | 0.027/0.44 |
2 | H2SO4 (0.15 mmol) | [bmim]BF4, 80 °C | 30 | 92 (ref. 10) | 0.92/0.015 | 0.015/0.44 |
3 | Iodine (0.1 g) | Sonic bath | 10 | 92 (ref. 14) | 0.92/0.1 | 0.1/0.44 |
4 | A (5 mol%) | S.F. 100 °C | 6 | 93 (ref. 15) | 0.93/0.1 | 0.1/0.44 |
5 | B (0.02 g) | S.F. 110 °C | 10 | 95 (ref. 16) | 0.95/0.02 | 0.02/0.44 |
6 | C (0.08 g) | S.F. 70 °C | 30 | 97 [this work] | 0.097/0.08 | 0.08/0.44 |
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. See DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3ra02556j |
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2023 |