Mintu
Rehman
,
Sajib
Daimary
,
Rasajna
Madhusudhana
and
Rajendar
Goreti
*
School of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India-695551. E-mail: rajendar@iisertvm.ac.in
First published on 18th October 2024
A LiTMP-LiBr complex facilitates a novel cross-ester coupling of 2-methoxy o-toluate esters to directly yield isocoumarin without the formation of any carbonyl intermediate. Aggregation plays a pivotal role in driving proximity-induced lateral lithiation and expediting acylation. In addition to many natural product precursors, the synthesis of (+)- and (−)-lunatinins is shown.
The deprotonative metalation of benzylic C–H groups is a valuable method for forming new C–C and C–X bonds.5 Notably, the lateral lithiation of o-toluic acid 1 and its amide 2 produce a stable dianion (I), which selectively attacks various electrophiles, particularly acylating agents, resulting in the formation of the corresponding keto-derivatives (3 or 4).6 Suitable tactics are then required to cyclize the keto derivatives to the desired isocoumarins (Scheme 1a).7 On the other hand, for o-toluate esters 6, lateral lithiation is complicated due to the stability of the arylogous enolate intermediate (II), which leads to self-condensation to give dimerized product 7.8 The Staunton group reported the reaction of o-toluate esters with Wienreb amides through lateral lithiation and acylation to yield keto-esters 8 (Scheme 1b).9 Notwithstanding its good applicability, the approach is somewhat limited in terms of yield, primarily due to the dimerization of the ester. Additionally, a base-mediated enolization is required to convert ketoderivative 8 into isochromenone 9. Additionally, the use of acid chlorides10 produced poor yields along with complex products due to polycondensation. Conversely, esters have remained inert as electrophilic coupling partners in the condensation reactions of ortho-toluate esters to date.11
![]() | ||
Scheme 1 Complex-induced lateral lithiation, acylation, enolization and lactonization for isocoumarin synthesis. (III and IV: possible transition states, hypothetical structures). |
Esters are abundant and viable starting materials in organic synthesis. However, cross-ester condensation, in general, poses a formidable challenge due to the low electrophilicity of the acceptor ester.12 It is notably susceptible to issues of self-condensation and over-condensation. Self-condensation has been partially alleviated by using excess equivalents of pre-prepared aryl and tert-butyl ester enolates (V),13 or by the use of Ti- or Zr-based enolates.14,15 Nevertheless, cross-ester coupling involving arylogous enolates (VIII) remained an unsolved challenge.
Recently, we found that use of chelating metal ions (LiCl) in lateral lithiation effectively suppresses the self-dimerization of o-toluate esters.16 We anticipated that the excess Li salts promoted complex-induced lateral lithiation via tight chelation (III).17 Additionally, these salts work in tandem with acylating agents to enhance their electrophilicity, thereby facilitating facile nucleophilic addition (IV). This method is only known for Wienreb amides, and they produce only ketone even in the presence of a large excess of base.8,18 Despite extensive efforts, this reaction yielded self-dimerized ketone 7 consistently as the primary byproduct. Building on this finding, we hypothesized that esters might act as electrophilic partners in lateral lithiation, and unlike Wienreb amides,19 they could directly produce isocoumarins via enolization of ketone intermediate in situ.8 However, preventing self-dimerization of the toluate ester is the biggest hurdle. Generating the stable arylogous enolate as well as activating the acceptor ester simultaneously are crucial to achieve this challenging conversion. We speculated that establishing strong chelation is the key to facilitate this challenging cross-ester coupling; however, this strategy has not been used thus far.
The reaction of orsellinate 10 with methyl benzoate in the presence of LDA and excess LiCl provided the desired product 12 in 42% yield along with ketone 11 (22% yield; Table 1, entry 1). The reaction conditions were further optimized as shown in Table 1. Changing the additive to LiBr gave only a 20% yield (entry 2), and LiI and LiClO4 and the use of LiHMDS failed to give any desired product.20 In contrast, the use of LiTMP in combination with LiBr gave a clean conversion with the limitation that the reaction required more than 3 eq. of base to initiate enolate II formation (entries 3 and 4). Increasing the equivalents of base and changing the additives to MgCl2, MgBr2 and ZnCl2 provided the desired product maximum yield of 12 in entries 5–7 as 69%.
Entry | Reaction conditions | Yieldsa,b (%) |
---|---|---|
a Isolated yields. b Conditions A: base was added to a solution of 10, methyl benzoate and LiBr in THF at −78 °C. c Conditions B: methyl benzoate was added to the preprepared enolate of 10 at −78 °C. | ||
10![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
1 | LDA (3), LiCl (10), THF | 10![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
2 | LDA (4), LiBr (10), THF | 50![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | LiTMP (4), LiBr (3), THF | 26![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
44![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
||
4 | LiTMP (8), LiBr (3), THF | 30![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | LiTMP (5), MgCl2 (3), THF | 25![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | LiTMP (5), MgBr2 (5), THF | 36![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | LiTMP (5), ZnCl2 (5), THF | 78![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | LiTMP (5), LiBr (3), THF![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
9 |
LiTMP (5), LiBr (3), THF![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | LiTMP (5), LiClO4 (3), THF![]() ![]() |
0![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The LiTMP-LiBr complex, which is known to produce bromide-induced aggregates to establish a strong chelating complex, has been used to control the stereochemistry of enolates.21 Speculating that we could achieve similar effects,22 we added non-polar solvents such as hexane and cyclohexane to produce aggregates, which resulted in excellent yields of 12 (entries 8 and 9). Additives other than LiBr did not produce good yields of 12 (entry 10). More than three equivalents of the LiTMP-LiBr complex were required to generate the enolate, which was indicated by the formation of a red-coloured solution, which underscores the pronounced aggregation effect at play. The intricate aggregate becomes the epicentre for the proximity-induced lateral lithiation through complex III, ultimately leading to the generation of stable arylogous enolate species. Within this aggregate, the acceptor ester also participates through IV, creating a harmonious molecular environment that sets the stage for acylation and subsequent lactonization. Changes in the base, solvent or additive, however, provided unsatisfactory yields of 12.20
Following the establishment of the standard reaction conditions (entry 11, Table 1), we expanded the applicability and versatility of the method as illustrated in Table 2. Aromatic esters with diverse alkyl and aryl substituents produced the corresponding isocoumarins 14, 15, 16 and 24 in >90% yields. The presence of chelating groups on the acceptor ester did not significantly affect the reaction yields, and isocoumarins 17,2318, 2224 and 23 were produced in 83% to 94% yields. Halogen-substituted esters required a change in the addition sequence; the addition of the ester to the prepared enolate gave isocoumarins 19, 20 and 21 in good yields of >80%.
Unfortunately, the method did not work with enolizable esters. Most interestingly, esters having an α- or β-hydroxyl functionality produced the corresponding isocoumarin products 25, 26, 27,252826 and 3829 in fair yields. This was a very interesting result, given that there was no protecting group involved, which paves the way for the synthesis of such hydroxyl-substituted naturally abundant and pharmacologically important 3-substituted isocoumarins.27
Moreover, o-toluate esters bearing 2-OTBS and 2-OTs groups showed no reactivity under the standard conditions. The substrate with a 2-OBn group resulted in a complex mixture, and that with an OMOM group provided 32 in 54% yield. 2-Methoxy toluate ester exhibited good reactivity with various aryl esters, yielding isocoumarins 33, 3428 to 3528 in excellent yields. Similarly, toluate esters with three methoxy substituents showed good reactivity, affording isocoumarins 36 and 3729 in yields exceeding 80%. The presence of a halogen atom in the toluate ester did not affect the reaction outcome, and compound 39 was produced in 89% yield.
Furthermore, role of chelating groups on enolate stability was estimated through control experiments. As shown in Scheme 2a, the absence of the directing group (2-OMe) led to rapid self-dimerization to provide isocoumarin 40 in 65% yield. An unprotected 2-OH group provided complex products, and the reaction of 3-methoxy toluate ester was unsuccessful. These results highlight the significance of the 2-OMe group, which stabilizes the enolate through a tight chelate complex. Conversely, a chelating group at the 5-position, such as that in 2,5-dimethoxy o-toluate ester, interferes with the reaction path, resulting in a complex mixture instead formation of 43.
To understand the reaction mechanism, keto-ester 11 was first prepared and then subjected to cyclization. LiOMe (a byproduct in the reaction) was reacted with the ketone at −78 °C, but proved ineffective in promoting cyclization (Scheme 2b). However, at higher temperatures (25 °C), lactonization was promoted effectively to give 12. The LiTMP-LiBr complex effectively promoted enolization and cyclization at −78 °C, resulting in complete conversion to 12. These findings indicate that enolate formation is sequentially facilitated in two stages by the LiTMP-LiBr complex. Isocoumarin is the core structure of many natural products;1 for example 12 serves as a synthetic precursor for montroumarin.31 Similarly, several products obtained in this study can serve as synthetic intermediates for scorzocreticin,23 thumborginols A28 and B,24 cytogenin,26 dimethoxy thumborginol A,29 diaportin, orthosporin,25 and other natural 6,8-dihydroxy-7-methoxy isocoumarins.30
Lunatinin,32 which has been isolated from various sources as both the (+)- and (−)-isomers, possesses intriguing biological activities; notably, it shows strong HMG-CoA reductase inhibitory activity (IC50 128 μg mL−1) comparable to the standard drug Lovastatin (IC50 160 μg mL−1).33 The absolute structure of (−)-lunatinin was established based on ECD studies. We utilized the LiTMP-LiBr complex-induced tandem lateral lithiation, acylation and lactonization of o-toluate esters to give isocoumarin and a shortest possible route to lunatinin.33 The total synthesis commenced with commercial ester 45. It was coupled with commercially available optically pure methyl (S)-3-hydroxybutanoate in the presence of the LiTMP-LiBr complex, producing isocoumarin 45S in 63% yield (Scheme 3). The absolute structure of 45S was confirmed by X-ray analysis. Demethylation of two phenolic groups of 45S using BBr3 afforded (S)-lunatinin (47S) in 93% yield. All the spectral data of synthetic 47S were identical to the reported data; however, the specific rotation α23D= −19.3 (c 0.3, MeOH) showed a deviation in magnitude. Similarly, the cross-ester condensation of 44 with methyl (R)-3-hydroxybutanoate followed by methyl deprotection provided R-lunatinin (46R) in 57% in two steps.
In conclusion, our innovative one-step synthetic route to isocoumarins from 2-methoxyl o-toluate esters, employing the LiTMP-LiBr complex, has proven to be a highly efficient and versatile method. This is the first method that shows the influence of aggregates in complex-induced lateral lithiation of toluate esters. This unique feature extends to the first cross-ester coupling of o-toluate ester with other esters. The reaction mechanism involves a seamless tandem process, including proximity-induced lateral lithiation, complex induced acylation, enolization, and lactonization. Furthermore, we demonstrated the utility of our method through a concise total synthesis of (+)- and (−)-lunatinins.
Footnote |
† Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available. CCDC 2365878 (for 45S) and 2365877 (for 45R). For ESI and crystallographic data in CIF or other electronic format see DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d4qo01678e |
This journal is © the Partner Organisations 2025 |